1 00:00:00,950 --> 00:00:05,270 Good news! Scientists say the Antarctic ozone hole is on the road to recovery 2 00:00:05,290 --> 00:00:05,710 3 00:00:05,730 --> 00:00:11,480 The amounts of ozone-depleting substances grew rapidly in our atmosphere in the 80s and early 1990s 4 00:00:11,500 --> 00:00:11,870 5 00:00:11,890 --> 00:00:17,100 but had stopped growing in late 90s because of the 1987 Montreal Protocol 6 00:00:17,120 --> 00:00:17,360 7 00:00:17,380 --> 00:00:21,560 As levels of these manufactured chemicals have decreased in the last 14 years 8 00:00:21,580 --> 00:00:24,400 the ozone hole has seen a slight improvement 9 00:00:24,420 --> 00:00:25,300 10 00:00:25,320 --> 00:00:30,650 Today, satellite observations by NASA and NOAA show the peak size of this year’s ozone hole 11 00:00:30,670 --> 00:00:36,990 measured 9.3 million square miles—an area roughly the size of North America 12 00:00:37,010 --> 00:00:37,190 13 00:00:37,210 --> 00:00:40,290 This area is smaller than holes observed in past years 14 00:00:40,310 --> 00:00:43,700 and significantly less than the largest hole on record 15 00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:43,990 16 00:00:44,010 --> 00:00:50,480 But scientists say the decrease of ozone-depleting substances isn’t the only factor that has contributed to these improvements 17 00:00:50,500 --> 00:00:51,180 18 00:00:51,200 --> 00:00:56,650 Rising temperatures in an upper layer of the atmosphere known as the stratosphere may also play a role 19 00:00:56,670 --> 00:00:57,200 20 00:00:57,220 --> 00:01:01,710 Colder temperatures over the polar regions have been shown to promote ozone depletion 21 00:01:01,730 --> 00:01:04,300 while warmer temperatures lead to increased ozone 22 00:01:04,320 --> 00:01:04,770 23 00:01:04,790 --> 00:01:08,180 Years with warmer temperatures generally had smaller holes 24 00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:10,900 while colder temperatures had larger holes 25 00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:11,370 26 00:01:11,390 --> 00:01:15,180 So how much of the ozone hole’s recovery is due to a rising temperatures 27 00:01:15,200 --> 00:01:18,520 versus decreasing levels of manufactured chemicals? 28 00:01:18,540 --> 00:01:18,720 29 00:01:18,740 --> 00:01:20,600 Scientists are looking to answer this question 30 00:01:20,620 --> 00:01:22,680