{
    "count": 7,
    "next": null,
    "previous": null,
    "results": [
        {
            "id": 5051,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5051/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2022-12-12T00:00:00-05:00",
            "title": "Drought conditions set the stage for an intense fire season in California in 2021",
            "description": "NASA’s Earth Information System (EIS) analysis captures the onset of drought and heightened fire conditions in mid-August 2021, with seasonal deficits of rainfall, exceptionally dry soils, onset of acute vegetation stress, and reduced plant growth. || fire_hyro_VIZ01_final_HD.02350_print.jpg (1024x576) [135.1 KB] || fire_hyro_VIZ01_final_HD.02350_searchweb.png (320x180) [73.4 KB] || fire_hyro_VIZ01_final_HD.02350_thm.png (80x40) [5.1 KB] || fire_hyro_VIZ01_final_HD_1080p59.94.mp4 (1920x1080) [20.6 MB] || 1920x1080_16x9_60p (1920x1080) [256.0 KB] || fire_hyro_VIZ01_final_HD_1080p59.94.webm (1920x1080) [6.7 MB] || fire_hyro_VIZ01_final_4k_2160p59.94.mp4 (3840x2160) [66.2 MB] || 3840x2160_16x9_60p (3840x2160) [256.0 KB] || 9600x3240_16x9_30p (9600x3240) [256.0 KB] || ",
            "hits": 31
        },
        {
            "id": 5052,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/5052/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2022-12-12T00:00:00-05:00",
            "title": "Post-Fire: Assessing Downstream Effects on Hydrology and Water Quality (Thomas Fire)",
            "description": "Tracing Hydrological impacts of wildfires to understand downstream landslide risks; an example of the 2017 Thomas Fire, Southern California. || thomas_fire_FINAL_035_HD.04500_print.jpg (1024x576) [211.6 KB] || thomas_fire_FINAL_035_HD.04500_searchweb.png (320x180) [81.0 KB] || thomas_fire_FINAL_035_HD.04500_thm.png (80x40) [6.0 KB] || thomas_fire_FINAL_035_HD_1080p59.94.mp4 (1920x1080) [28.5 MB] || 1920x1080_16x9_60p (1920x1080) [256.0 KB] || thomas_fire_FINAL_035_HD_1080p59.94.webm (1920x1080) [6.9 MB] || thomas_fire_FINAL_035_4k_2160p59.94.mp4 (3840x2160) [90.0 MB] || 9600x3240_16x9_30p (9600x3240) [128.0 KB] || 3840x2160_16x9_60p (3840x2160) [256.0 KB] || ",
            "hits": 34
        },
        {
            "id": 4575,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4575/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2017-07-31T00:00:00-04:00",
            "title": "NASA Studies Hurricane Matthew",
            "description": "This data visualization follows Hurricane Matthew throughout its destructive run in the Caribbean and Southeast U.S. coast. By utilizing different data sets from NOAA's GOES satellite, NASA/JAXA's GPM, MERRA-2 model runs, IMERG, Goddard's soil moisture product, and sea surface temperatures, scientists are able to put together a clearer picture of how this hurricane quickly intensified and eventually weakened. || matthew_narrated_v106.5800_print.jpg (1024x576) [189.6 KB] || matthew_narrated_v106.5800_searchweb.png (320x180) [114.8 KB] || matthew_narrated_v106.5800_thm.png (80x40) [7.8 KB] || matthew (1920x1080) [0 Item(s)] || matthew_narrated_v106.webm (1920x1080) [22.0 MB] || matthew_narrated_v106.mp4 (1920x1080) [140.5 MB] || 3840x2160_16x9_30p (3840x2160) [0 Item(s)] || matthew_narrated_v106_4k.mp4 (3840x2160) [443.1 MB] || matthew_narrated_nosound.hwshow || ",
            "hits": 96
        },
        {
            "id": 4149,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4149/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2014-03-05T00:00:00-05:00",
            "title": "Hyperwall Show: CMIP5 - 21st Century Temperature and Precipitation Scenarios",
            "description": "These data visualizations from the NASA Center for Climate Simulation and NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio at Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., show how climate models used in the new report from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimate possible temperature and precipitation pattern changes throughout the 21st century. The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change publishes a report on the consensus view of climate change science about every five to seven years. The first findings of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) were released on Sept. 27, 2013, in the form of the Summary for Policymakers report and a draft of IPCC Working Group 1's Physical Science Basis. The IPCC does not perform new science but instead authors a report that establishes the established understanding of the world's climate science community.The report not only includes observations of the real world but also the results of climate model projections of how the Earth will respond as a system to rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. The IPCC's AR5 relies on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) effort, an international effort among the climate modeling community to coordinate climate change experiments. These visualizations represent the mean output of how certain groups of CMIP5 models responded to four different scenarios defined by the IPCC called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). These four RCPs – 2.6, 4.5, 6 and 8.5 – represent a wide range of potential worldwide greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration scenarios for the coming century. The pathways are numbered based on the expected Watts per square meter – essentially a measure of how much heat energy is being trapped by the climate system – each scenario would produce. The pathways are partly based on the ultimate concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The current carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is around 400 parts per million, up from less than 300 parts per million at the end of the 19th century.The carbon dioxide concentrations in the year 2100 for each RCP are:RCP 2.6: 421 ppmRCP 4.5: 538 ppmRCP 6: 670 ppmRCP 8.5: 936 ppmEach visualization represents the mean output of a different number of models for each RCP, because data from all models in the CMIP5 project was not available in the same format for visualization for each RCP. All of the models compare a projection of temperatures and precipitation from 2006-2099 to a baseline historical average from 1971-2000. Thus, the values shown for each year represent the departure for that year compared to the observed average global surface temperature from 1971-2000. The IPCC report used 1986-2005 as a baseline period, making its reported anomalies slightly different from those shown in the visualizations. || ",
            "hits": 33
        },
        {
            "id": 4110,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4110/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2013-09-27T09:52:00-04:00",
            "title": "CMIP5: 21st Century Temperature and Precipitation Scenarios",
            "description": "These data visualizations from the NASA Center for Climate Simulation and NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio at Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., show how climate models used in the new report from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimate possible temperature and precipitation pattern changes throughout the 21st century. The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change publishes a report on the consensus view of climate change science about every five to seven years. The first findings of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) were released on Sept. 27, 2013, in the form of the Summary for Policymakers report and a draft of IPCC Working Group 1's Physical Science Basis. The IPCC does not perform new science but instead authors a report that establishes the established understanding of the world's climate science community.The report not only includes observations of the real world but also the results of climate model projections of how the Earth will respond as a system to rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. The IPCC's AR5 relies on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) effort, an international effort among the climate modeling community to coordinate climate change experiments. These visualizations represent the mean output of how certain groups of CMIP5 models responded to four different scenarios defined by the IPCC called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). These four RCPs – 2.6, 4.5, 6 and 8.5 – represent a wide range of potential worldwide greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration scenarios for the coming century. The pathways are numbered based on the expected Watts per square meter – essentially a measure of how much heat energy is being trapped by the climate system – each scenario would produce. The pathways are partly based on the ultimate concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The current carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is around 400 parts per million, up from less than 300 parts per million at the end of the 19th century.The carbon dioxide concentrations in the year 2100 for each RCP are:RCP 2.6: 421 ppmRCP 4.5: 538 ppmRCP 6: 670 ppmRCP 8.5: 936 ppmEach visualization represents the mean output of a different number of models for each RCP, because data from all models in the CMIP5 project was not available in the same format for visualization for each RCP. All of the models compare a projection of temperatures and precipitation from 2006-2099 to a baseline historical average from 1971-2000. Thus, the values shown for each year represent the departure for that year compared to the observed average global surface temperature from 1971-2000. The IPCC report used 1986-2005 as a baseline period, making its reported anomalies slightly different from those shown in the visualizations. || ",
            "hits": 49
        },
        {
            "id": 4106,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4106/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2013-09-27T08:00:00-04:00",
            "title": "CMIP5: 21st Century Precipitation Scenarios",
            "description": "These data visualizations from the NASA Center for Climate Simulation and NASA's Scientific Visualization Studio at Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md., show how climate models used in the new report from the United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) estimate possible precipitation changes throughout the 21st century. The United Nations' Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change publishes a report on the consensus view of climate change science about every five to seven years. The first findings of the IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report (AR5) were released on Sept. 27, 2013, in the form of the Summary for Policymakers report and a draft of IPCC Working Group 1's Physical Science Basis. The IPCC does not perform new science but instead authors a report that establishes the established understanding of the world's climate science community.The report not only includes observations of the real world but also the results of climate model projections of how the Earth will respond as a system to rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. The IPCC's AR5 relies on the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5) effort, an international effort among the climate modeling community to coordinate climate change experiments. These visualizations represent the mean output of how certain groups of CMIP5 models responded to four different scenarios called Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs). These four RCPs – 2.6, 4.5, 6 and 8.5 – represent a wide range of potential worldwide greenhouse gas emissions and sequestration scenarios for the coming century. The pathways are numbered based on the expected Watts per square meter – essentially a measure of how much heat energy is being trapped by the climate system – each scenario would produce. The pathways are partly based on the ultimate concentrations of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases. The current carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere is around 400 parts per million, up from less than 300 parts per million at the end of the 19th century.The carbon dioxide concentrations in the year 2100 for each RCP are:RCP 2.6: 421 ppmRCP 4.5: 538 ppmRCP 6: 670 ppmRCP 8.5: 936 ppmEach visualization represents the mean output of a different number of models for each RCP, because data from all models in the CMIP5 project was not available in the same format for visualization for each RCP. All of the models compare a projection of precipitation changes from 2006-2099 to a baseline historical average from 1971-2000. Thus, the values shown for each year represent the departure for that year compared to the observed average precipitation from 1971-2000. The IPCC report used 1986-2005 as a baseline period, making its reported anomalies slightly different from those shown in the visualizations. || ",
            "hits": 37
        },
        {
            "id": 3903,
            "url": "https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/3903/",
            "result_type": "Visualization",
            "release_date": "2012-01-31T00:00:00-05:00",
            "title": "Modeled Precipitation Difference Between 2010 Snowmageddon Event and Winter of 2000",
            "description": "Three major snowstorms hit the east coast of the United States in the winter of 2009-2010. Scientists then posed the following question: What was the role of climate variability during this extreme winter? Utilizing high end computing resources at the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, scientists employed the use of the GEOS-5 atmospheric model in an ensemble of simulations to answer this question. Two case studies were produced. One was the winter of 2009-2010 and the other was the same months during the winter of 1999-2000. 50 member ensembles of high resolution simulations were run (each 3-months long beginning on December 1st for each winter).The resulting findings were that GEOS-5 simulations forced with observed Sea Surface Temperatures (SST) reproduce observed changes, including enhanced storminess along the United States east coast. The ensemble members showed that this is a robust response, and verified that anomalous weather events over the U.S. are, to a large extent, driven by El Niño SST. Furthermore, North Atlantic SST contributes to the coolor (snow-producing) temperatures along the U.S. east coast.By subtracting the results of the 1999-2000 runs from the 2009-2010 a difference map can be generated showing the areas that received more precipitation and areas that received less precipitation. Areas that received more precipitation in 2009-2010 over 1999-2000 are depicted in shades of green. Areas that received less precipitation between these two winters are depicted in shades of brown. || ",
            "hits": 23
        }
    ]
}