WEBVTT FILE 1 00:00:10.427 --> 00:00:12.145 Hello and welcome to this press 2 00:00:12.145 --> 00:00:14.597 briefing on the James Webb Space Telescope. 3 00:00:14.998 --> 00:00:15.949 I'm Karen Fox. 4 00:00:15.949 --> 00:00:18.151 With NASA's Office of Communications. 5 00:00:18.151 --> 00:00:18.985 And we are here today 6 00:00:18.985 --> 00:00:22.522 at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, 7 00:00:22.789 --> 00:00:25.108 to talk about the latest update on the Webb Telescope, 8 00:00:25.308 --> 00:00:27.827 which is all about aligning the mirrors. 9 00:00:27.827 --> 00:00:31.047 We will be taking Q&A from the media on the line. 10 00:00:31.281 --> 00:00:32.582 After some talks 11 00:00:32.582 --> 00:00:35.785 today, you can get in the queue by dialing Star One. 12 00:00:36.169 --> 00:00:38.071 We are also taking social media questions. 13 00:00:38.071 --> 00:00:41.191 Just post your question using the hashtag unfold the universe 14 00:00:41.391 --> 00:00:43.877 and we'll be taking some of those along the way as well. 15 00:00:44.778 --> 00:00:46.913 We are going to start out with Thomas Zurbuchen, 16 00:00:47.097 --> 00:00:50.400 the associate administrator for science at NASA headquarters 17 00:00:50.400 --> 00:00:52.802 in Washington, D.C.. Welcome. 18 00:00:52.802 --> 00:00:53.870 So glad to be here. 19 00:00:53.870 --> 00:00:55.972 What a day can It's exciting. 20 00:00:56.005 --> 00:00:57.240 Tell us why we're here. 21 00:00:57.240 --> 00:00:58.258 Well, look, 22 00:00:58.258 --> 00:01:00.477 this is one of the most magnificent days 23 00:01:00.477 --> 00:01:01.861 in my whole career right now. 24 00:01:01.861 --> 00:01:04.431 So frankly, and for many of us astronomers 25 00:01:04.647 --> 00:01:07.233 one of the most important days that we've had. 26 00:01:07.767 --> 00:01:10.887 Because even though there's still weeks and months 27 00:01:10.887 --> 00:01:13.623 ahead to really fully unleash the power 28 00:01:13.623 --> 00:01:15.892 of this new observatories orbiter at L2, 29 00:01:16.309 --> 00:01:18.978 today we can announce that the optics 30 00:01:18.978 --> 00:01:21.865 will perform to specifications or even better. 31 00:01:21.981 --> 00:01:24.000 It's an amazing achievement. 32 00:01:24.601 --> 00:01:25.368 Fantastic. 33 00:01:25.368 --> 00:01:27.887 Tell us a little more about how we got here. 34 00:01:27.921 --> 00:01:29.572 What brought us to this day? 35 00:01:29.572 --> 00:01:32.041 This has been a journey for over two decades. 36 00:01:32.041 --> 00:01:34.644 And I go and look at this team. 37 00:01:34.644 --> 00:01:37.347 They're sitting there right now, and each and every 38 00:01:37.347 --> 00:01:40.166 one of them is so important from different organizations 39 00:01:40.166 --> 00:01:44.087 from Goddard Space Telescope, Northrop Grumman Ball, which 40 00:01:44.637 --> 00:01:47.090 spend work on this, and other contractors, 41 00:01:47.090 --> 00:01:49.192 other participants from all around. 42 00:01:49.859 --> 00:01:53.513 But for everyone who sits there, there's tens, hundreds 43 00:01:53.963 --> 00:01:57.617 that have contributed to this from the idea stage 44 00:01:57.767 --> 00:02:00.436 20 plus two years ago with ten plus 45 00:02:00.436 --> 00:02:02.972 new technologies that had to be invented 46 00:02:03.590 --> 00:02:07.410 coming up with this fragmented mirror 21 feet across 47 00:02:07.410 --> 00:02:11.147 18 pieces at the flatness not conceived before 48 00:02:11.664 --> 00:02:14.033 and now putting it together 49 00:02:14.033 --> 00:02:17.036 to get to this place of course launching from Kourou 50 00:02:17.036 --> 00:02:18.688 together with our international partners, 51 00:02:18.688 --> 00:02:21.741 deploying it seamlessly in space and now 52 00:02:21.741 --> 00:02:24.611 aligning that optics it's great. 53 00:02:24.627 --> 00:02:26.729 I've heard you talk a lot about this team 54 00:02:26.729 --> 00:02:28.481 and your admiration for this team. 55 00:02:28.481 --> 00:02:31.017 And my understanding is this is really the first time 56 00:02:31.017 --> 00:02:33.086 we have ever done this where we've had to hold a mirror 57 00:02:33.086 --> 00:02:35.939 and put it up into the fairing before launch. 58 00:02:36.239 --> 00:02:38.725 And to talk me through that a little bit. 59 00:02:38.758 --> 00:02:39.325 What? What? 60 00:02:40.793 --> 00:02:42.962 How much had to be conceived and brought to where we are? 61 00:02:43.530 --> 00:02:46.199 Look, I mean, when we have a mission, normally 62 00:02:46.199 --> 00:02:49.068 elsewhere in our portfolio, we think of like one or two. 63 00:02:49.369 --> 00:02:52.705 I call them miracles, you know, kind of new ideas, entirely new 64 00:02:52.705 --> 00:02:56.276 technologies that when we start, we don't know yet 65 00:02:56.276 --> 00:02:59.395 whether they're going to work this telescope. 66 00:02:59.395 --> 00:03:01.981 This observatory now had ten of them, 67 00:03:01.981 --> 00:03:04.200 perhaps even 12, depending on how you count. 68 00:03:04.801 --> 00:03:09.172 And you should know that the ingenuity of the entire team, 69 00:03:09.172 --> 00:03:11.941 you know, the diverse team that came together the best 70 00:03:11.941 --> 00:03:14.727 that they offer from the international community 71 00:03:15.228 --> 00:03:16.012 got us here. 72 00:03:16.012 --> 00:03:18.531 You know, for me, when I think about this, frankly, 73 00:03:18.831 --> 00:03:21.050 I've said it before, I'm saying it again. 74 00:03:21.050 --> 00:03:23.636 I think of that in amazing 75 00:03:23.636 --> 00:03:26.789 challenge, really at the edge of what's possible. 76 00:03:27.140 --> 00:03:29.325 And they did it in a way that, frankly, 77 00:03:29.342 --> 00:03:32.629 to outside observers make it look easy. 78 00:03:32.962 --> 00:03:36.366 And what people should see is not that it's easy. 79 00:03:36.416 --> 00:03:38.301 It will be far from the truth. 80 00:03:38.301 --> 00:03:41.387 I've lost sleepless nights, awkwardness, 81 00:03:41.838 --> 00:03:43.890 this particular step, but also outer step 82 00:03:43.890 --> 00:03:46.409 that this team put behind them in a fashion. 83 00:03:46.409 --> 00:03:47.093 What you should see 84 00:03:47.093 --> 00:03:50.663 is just the amazing quality of a team coming together, 85 00:03:50.663 --> 00:03:54.567 United behind a purpose and, you know, desire 86 00:03:54.567 --> 00:03:57.203 to see the universe in ways we've never seen before. 87 00:03:58.171 --> 00:03:59.722 So what's next? 88 00:03:59.822 --> 00:04:02.392 Well, so this team is going forward. 89 00:04:02.392 --> 00:04:04.861 It's doing the entire optics alignment 90 00:04:05.478 --> 00:04:07.280 continuing and finalizing it. 91 00:04:07.280 --> 00:04:08.932 And then, of course, it's all about instruments. 92 00:04:08.932 --> 00:04:10.817 Now we need to turn on these instruments 93 00:04:10.817 --> 00:04:13.286 and all the modes that are there, kind of 94 00:04:13.369 --> 00:04:15.872 somewhere in the summer, June-July, perhaps. 95 00:04:15.872 --> 00:04:18.775 You know, we're going to have kind of these modes there. 96 00:04:18.808 --> 00:04:23.313 We're going to be ready to really show that the universe 97 00:04:23.313 --> 00:04:23.997 that we've not 98 00:04:23.997 --> 00:04:27.150 seen in that infrared universe at that resolution. 99 00:04:27.467 --> 00:04:28.668 And then, frankly, 100 00:04:28.668 --> 00:04:30.837 what we're most excited about is turning it over 101 00:04:30.837 --> 00:04:33.740 to the science community to let that discovery 102 00:04:33.840 --> 00:04:36.109 begin at a level we've never seen before. 103 00:04:36.993 --> 00:04:37.977 Thank you so much. 104 00:04:37.977 --> 00:04:39.929 We really appreciate it. Thank you. 105 00:04:39.929 --> 00:04:42.899 We are going to keep Thomas here. 106 00:04:42.899 --> 00:04:45.051 He'll be here for the question and answer portion. 107 00:04:45.268 --> 00:04:48.888 But for now, we are moving on to the rest of the panel. 108 00:04:49.188 --> 00:04:50.940 We have a great panel here. For you today. 109 00:04:50.940 --> 00:04:53.660 We have Eileen Fineberg, who is the Webb Optical 110 00:04:53.660 --> 00:04:57.113 Telescope Element Manager here at NASA Goddard. 111 00:04:57.413 --> 00:05:00.383 We have Aaron Wolfe, who is the Web program manager 112 00:05:00.383 --> 00:05:03.303 at Ball Aerospace in Broomfield, Colorado. 113 00:05:03.536 --> 00:05:06.589 Marshall Perron, the deputy telescope scientist 114 00:05:06.589 --> 00:05:09.442 at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore. 115 00:05:09.442 --> 00:05:10.193 Maryland. 116 00:05:10.193 --> 00:05:13.162 And Jane Rigby, who is the Web Operations 117 00:05:13.162 --> 00:05:16.432 Project Scientist also here at NASA Goddard. 118 00:05:16.432 --> 00:05:18.267 We're going to start off with Lee. 119 00:05:18.267 --> 00:05:21.087 He's going to tell us a little bit more about this alignment. 120 00:05:22.555 --> 00:05:23.222 Thank you, Karen. 121 00:05:23.222 --> 00:05:24.090 Well, we have now 122 00:05:24.090 --> 00:05:26.359 finished the fourth and fifth phases 123 00:05:26.359 --> 00:05:27.527 of the telescope alignment. 124 00:05:27.527 --> 00:05:30.413 We call those phases course phasing in fine phasing. 125 00:05:30.830 --> 00:05:33.116 And that's where we've made the primary mirror 126 00:05:33.116 --> 00:05:36.169 all 18 mirror segments into a single primary mirror. 127 00:05:36.536 --> 00:05:38.521 And we will initially align the telescope 128 00:05:38.521 --> 00:05:39.772 to the near cam instrument. 129 00:05:39.772 --> 00:05:41.958 That's the instrument that we use to do the alignment. 130 00:05:42.475 --> 00:05:45.144 And and we've taken our first images. 131 00:05:45.144 --> 00:05:45.661 In fact, 132 00:05:45.661 --> 00:05:47.430 the team gathered over the weekend 133 00:05:47.430 --> 00:05:49.198 when the first images came down. 134 00:05:49.198 --> 00:05:51.084 We were in the mission control center. 135 00:05:51.084 --> 00:05:53.403 And it was a very emotional moment. 136 00:05:53.753 --> 00:05:57.206 We kind of blew this some of the images of stars up 137 00:05:57.206 --> 00:05:59.392 and really could see how it was performing. 138 00:05:59.842 --> 00:06:02.395 And I'm happy to say that the optical performance 139 00:06:02.395 --> 00:06:04.680 of the telescope is absolutely phenomenal. 140 00:06:04.731 --> 00:06:07.083 It is really working extremely well. 141 00:06:07.517 --> 00:06:10.286 And and we said last fall that we would know 142 00:06:10.286 --> 00:06:11.988 that the telescope is working properly 143 00:06:11.988 --> 00:06:14.807 when we have an image of a star that looks like a star. 144 00:06:15.324 --> 00:06:16.859 And and now we have that. 145 00:06:16.859 --> 00:06:18.511 And you're seeing that image 146 00:06:18.511 --> 00:06:20.997 This is actually a 2100 second exposure 147 00:06:21.748 --> 00:06:24.600 taken at roughly two microns, which is the wavelength 148 00:06:24.600 --> 00:06:27.687 which Webb was designed to work at or above 149 00:06:28.037 --> 00:06:30.990 and you not only see the star and the spikes 150 00:06:30.990 --> 00:06:31.224 from the 151 00:06:31.224 --> 00:06:32.842 diffraction of the star, but you see 152 00:06:32.842 --> 00:06:35.128 other stars in the field that are tightly focused, 153 00:06:35.428 --> 00:06:37.997 just like we expect and all sorts of other 154 00:06:37.997 --> 00:06:40.666 interesting structure in the background. 155 00:06:40.666 --> 00:06:41.367 We've actually done 156 00:06:41.367 --> 00:06:44.570 very detailed analysis of the images we're getting. 157 00:06:44.871 --> 00:06:47.957 And so far, what we're finding is that the performance is 158 00:06:48.241 --> 00:06:52.011 as good, if not better, than our most optimistic predictions. 159 00:06:52.011 --> 00:06:53.930 So we're really pleased with that. 160 00:06:53.930 --> 00:06:57.200 And to give you some perspective of what has happened 161 00:06:57.200 --> 00:06:58.801 and sort of how the telescope got here, 162 00:06:58.801 --> 00:07:01.521 we want to run this video clip to kind of show you 163 00:07:01.854 --> 00:07:03.990 what the telescope has been through to get to this point. 164 00:07:06.142 --> 00:07:06.926 Webb's science 165 00:07:06.926 --> 00:07:09.378 objectives required a large primary mirror, 166 00:07:09.479 --> 00:07:12.115 a mirror too large to fit inside the largest rocket 167 00:07:12.115 --> 00:07:13.583 fairing that exists. 168 00:07:13.583 --> 00:07:15.952 So we had to design Webb's optics to be folded 169 00:07:18.204 --> 00:07:19.822 This meant Webb's Mirror segments 170 00:07:19.822 --> 00:07:21.407 had to be extremely lightweight 171 00:07:21.407 --> 00:07:22.975 and individually controllable 172 00:07:22.975 --> 00:07:25.611 so they could be aligned in space. 173 00:07:25.611 --> 00:07:28.197 We put everything through rigorous testing to ensure 174 00:07:28.197 --> 00:07:31.017 Webb's delicate systems would survive, launch 175 00:07:31.017 --> 00:07:33.085 and work in the super cold vacuum of space. 176 00:07:33.719 --> 00:07:36.873 Webb's cryogenic test inside Chamber A at the Johnson 177 00:07:36.873 --> 00:07:40.309 Space Center in Houston in 20, 17, five years ago 178 00:07:40.610 --> 00:07:43.196 was actually the last time we tested the telescope 179 00:07:43.412 --> 00:07:45.381 or took images with the near Kim instrument, 180 00:07:45.381 --> 00:07:47.416 which is used to align the mirrors 181 00:07:47.416 --> 00:07:49.652 at Northrop Grumman in Los Angeles. 182 00:07:49.652 --> 00:07:51.587 Webb's optical segment was integrated 183 00:07:51.587 --> 00:07:52.371 with the spacecraft 184 00:07:52.371 --> 00:07:54.590 and Sunshield segment, and we did more testing. 185 00:07:55.308 --> 00:07:57.243 One thing we can't directly test on Earth 186 00:07:57.243 --> 00:07:59.462 is the effect of zero-G on the system. 187 00:07:59.462 --> 00:08:01.197 We use computer models. 188 00:08:01.197 --> 00:08:03.716 These models give us confidence it would work in the zero 189 00:08:03.716 --> 00:08:05.151 gravity environment, a space 190 00:08:06.719 --> 00:08:09.238 We packed Webb and shipped it out from Los Angeles to the 191 00:08:09.238 --> 00:08:12.391 Panama Canal to the Gardner Space Center in French Guiana. 192 00:08:13.042 --> 00:08:16.128 There, Webb was placed atop the Ariane five rocket 193 00:08:16.128 --> 00:08:19.131 and launched into space on December 25th. 194 00:08:19.999 --> 00:08:24.120 And. The collection deck or large lift off 195 00:08:24.120 --> 00:08:27.290 from a tropical rainforest to the edge of time itself. 196 00:08:27.740 --> 00:08:30.409 James Webb begins a voyage back to the birth 197 00:08:30.409 --> 00:08:32.028 of the universe. 198 00:08:34.580 --> 00:08:37.099 Punching a hole through the clouds. 199 00:08:37.099 --> 00:08:39.869 This is the first time the Webb Observatory was exposed 200 00:08:39.869 --> 00:08:41.337 to the vacuum of space. 201 00:08:41.337 --> 00:08:45.057 The heat of the sun and zero gravity. 202 00:08:45.141 --> 00:08:47.009 Moments after launch, the solar panel 203 00:08:47.009 --> 00:08:48.144 deployed 204 00:08:50.780 --> 00:08:52.248 for the next several weeks. 205 00:08:52.248 --> 00:08:52.698 The Space 206 00:08:52.698 --> 00:08:56.369 Telescope Science Institute team unfolded about 50 parts, 207 00:08:56.369 --> 00:08:59.071 including the sunshield and the mirrors. 208 00:08:59.071 --> 00:09:01.340 The open sunshield helped cool down the instruments, 209 00:09:01.340 --> 00:09:03.626 a mirror to about -400 degrees Fahrenheit. 210 00:09:04.227 --> 00:09:06.229 One of Webb's final deployments was releasing 211 00:09:06.229 --> 00:09:08.447 the Mirror segments from their launch locks. 212 00:09:08.447 --> 00:09:10.533 Then we could start the Mirror alignment process 213 00:09:11.634 --> 00:09:13.402 for the next six weeks, the optics team 214 00:09:13.402 --> 00:09:16.072 worked to perfectly aligned Webb's mirrors. 215 00:09:16.072 --> 00:09:18.140 We had to engineer the telescope and mirrors 216 00:09:18.140 --> 00:09:21.327 to survive all of this and meet demanding optical requirements 217 00:09:28.668 --> 00:09:31.237 So this achievement was not an accident. 218 00:09:31.254 --> 00:09:35.157 It took a lot of hard work and just a total commitment 219 00:09:35.157 --> 00:09:38.628 to excellence by a number of teams over. 220 00:09:38.661 --> 00:09:40.580 For over 20 years, I've been fortunate 221 00:09:40.580 --> 00:09:41.731 enough to work with teams 222 00:09:41.731 --> 00:09:44.717 from Northrop Grumman Ball Aerospace L-3 Harris. 223 00:09:45.117 --> 00:09:47.520 Four different NASA's centers contributed to this, 224 00:09:47.903 --> 00:09:51.173 as well as ESCO Space Telescope and many other companies, 225 00:09:51.507 --> 00:09:54.293 as well as our collaborations with European Space Agency 226 00:09:54.293 --> 00:09:56.629 and the Canadian Space Agency and all the interfaces 227 00:09:56.879 --> 00:09:59.098 and all the aspects of the telescope. 228 00:09:59.098 --> 00:10:02.218 And with all that hard work and dedication, we can now 229 00:10:02.218 --> 00:10:05.371 say it was worth it, that the telescope itself is working. 230 00:10:05.688 --> 00:10:06.806 We still have work to go 231 00:10:06.806 --> 00:10:07.223 to bring on 232 00:10:07.223 --> 00:10:09.775 the rest of the observatory, the rest of the instruments, 233 00:10:10.226 --> 00:10:11.911 finish the alignment of the telescope 234 00:10:11.911 --> 00:10:13.079 to the other instruments 235 00:10:13.079 --> 00:10:15.147 but the optical performance is working, 236 00:10:15.448 --> 00:10:18.751 and we're getting very close to the point that we can turn this 237 00:10:18.751 --> 00:10:21.871 amazing scientific tool over to the astronomical community 238 00:10:22.405 --> 00:10:25.458 and kind of want to leave with the thought that not only have 239 00:10:25.458 --> 00:10:26.659 we built this amazing 240 00:10:26.659 --> 00:10:28.878 scientific capability for this generation, 241 00:10:29.278 --> 00:10:31.397 but we've sort of pioneered a new way to build 242 00:10:31.397 --> 00:10:34.500 large space telescopes which we can give 243 00:10:34.500 --> 00:10:36.502 to the next generation of future generations. 244 00:10:37.586 --> 00:10:39.805 Thank you so much, Lee. 245 00:10:39.805 --> 00:10:42.241 We are now moving on to Aaron Wolfe 246 00:10:42.541 --> 00:10:45.294 who is the Web program manager at Ball Aerospace. 247 00:10:45.328 --> 00:10:47.697 She's going to give us some details about the engineering 248 00:10:47.930 --> 00:10:51.050 that made all of this alignment happen. 249 00:10:51.617 --> 00:10:52.134 We're seeing 250 00:10:52.134 --> 00:10:54.837 the payoff of years of technology development, 251 00:10:55.104 --> 00:10:58.257 the optical hardware that we spent years manufacturing 252 00:10:58.257 --> 00:11:01.377 and polishing and measuring down to the tens of nanometers 253 00:11:01.711 --> 00:11:05.064 is working better than our most optimistic predicts. 254 00:11:05.097 --> 00:11:06.949 It's very exciting. 255 00:11:06.949 --> 00:11:09.418 We also spent a lot of time developing the algorithms 256 00:11:09.418 --> 00:11:10.820 and the mathematical processes 257 00:11:10.820 --> 00:11:13.239 that we would need to perform this alignment in space. 258 00:11:13.406 --> 00:11:15.975 We've never had a segmented telescope in space before, 259 00:11:15.991 --> 00:11:18.511 so we had to invent a whole new process. 260 00:11:18.511 --> 00:11:21.897 So we built a 16 scale model of a testbed telescope 261 00:11:21.897 --> 00:11:23.883 in Colorado to prove out all of those 262 00:11:23.883 --> 00:11:25.885 algorithms and run through the process 263 00:11:26.452 --> 00:11:28.971 that dictates how what our 264 00:11:29.338 --> 00:11:31.557 moves will be on the motors 265 00:11:34.343 --> 00:11:34.794 And it's 266 00:11:34.794 --> 00:11:37.496 actually been easier in space than it was in the lab. 267 00:11:38.297 --> 00:11:40.850 So we used the motors on the back of the mirrors 268 00:11:40.850 --> 00:11:43.285 to make small adjustments to the mirror positions 269 00:11:43.819 --> 00:11:46.889 And we also have that center radius of curvature actuated 270 00:11:46.889 --> 00:11:48.391 that can actually change 271 00:11:48.391 --> 00:11:51.444 the curvature and shape of each individual segment 272 00:11:51.527 --> 00:11:55.097 as we align and tip and tilt and piston through focus 273 00:11:55.381 --> 00:11:56.399 and move them all around. 274 00:11:56.399 --> 00:11:57.116 And the goal here 275 00:11:57.116 --> 00:12:00.453 is to get all 18 segments to work together as one. 276 00:12:00.536 --> 00:12:02.671 One big, monolithic primary mirror 277 00:12:03.322 --> 00:12:06.475 And you can really see the progression of this process 278 00:12:06.475 --> 00:12:08.177 through our pupil images. 279 00:12:08.177 --> 00:12:10.579 So a couple of weeks ago, we took this pupil image 280 00:12:10.946 --> 00:12:12.081 and you can see one segments 281 00:12:12.081 --> 00:12:15.534 really lit up brightly with some starlight coming in. 282 00:12:15.534 --> 00:12:19.789 But now we have a new pupil image with all 18 segments 283 00:12:19.789 --> 00:12:22.858 just lit up and it looks wonderful. 284 00:12:23.459 --> 00:12:24.443 So we're really excited. 285 00:12:24.443 --> 00:12:26.245 So far, the process is working 286 00:12:26.245 --> 00:12:29.432 and the hardware is performing better than requirements. 287 00:12:29.815 --> 00:12:32.001 We couldn't be happier and it's just a testament 288 00:12:32.017 --> 00:12:35.971 like Thomas and Lee have said to all of the years and years 289 00:12:35.971 --> 00:12:40.292 of hard work that everyone has put in, people that haven't. 290 00:12:40.376 --> 00:12:43.529 Not necessarily on the team now for the commissioning, 291 00:12:43.729 --> 00:12:46.499 but they did the technology development decades ago. 292 00:12:46.532 --> 00:12:48.868 The integration for many, many years. 293 00:12:49.168 --> 00:12:52.488 So it's really an honor to bring Webber 294 00:12:52.488 --> 00:12:53.722 through this process 295 00:12:53.722 --> 00:12:55.941 now at the end and work on all of that 296 00:12:55.941 --> 00:12:58.944 amazing technology development that the team did back then. 297 00:13:01.497 --> 00:13:03.415 Thank you to Aaron. 298 00:13:03.415 --> 00:13:06.469 We are now going to move to Marshall Perron with the Space 299 00:13:06.469 --> 00:13:09.588 Telescope Science Institute is going to give us more details 300 00:13:09.588 --> 00:13:11.340 about the alignment 301 00:13:12.241 --> 00:13:12.708 Thanks. 302 00:13:12.708 --> 00:13:16.228 So the alignment process began after the initial deployments 303 00:13:16.228 --> 00:13:16.579 of Webb 304 00:13:16.579 --> 00:13:18.481 back in the first few weeks of this year 305 00:13:18.481 --> 00:13:21.984 and those large unfolding motions that got the mirrors out 306 00:13:21.984 --> 00:13:25.371 to about within a millimeter or so of their desired locations. 307 00:13:25.371 --> 00:13:28.607 But in order to have the mirrors all actors as one, they need 308 00:13:28.607 --> 00:13:31.677 to be lined up to just within a few nanometers of one another. 309 00:13:31.677 --> 00:13:34.480 That ends up being it's a few hundred atomic diameters, 310 00:13:34.513 --> 00:13:36.615 the level of precision that we need here. 311 00:13:36.615 --> 00:13:38.851 So to do that, 312 00:13:38.851 --> 00:13:40.736 we step through a long process. 313 00:13:40.736 --> 00:13:43.489 The team has been preparing and practicing for many, many years 314 00:13:43.823 --> 00:13:47.426 in which we begin by finding the 18 spots of light, 315 00:13:48.260 --> 00:13:50.429 that one from each of the mirrors. 316 00:13:50.429 --> 00:13:52.848 And we gather those together. 317 00:13:52.848 --> 00:13:54.950 We begin by aligning them all 318 00:13:55.284 --> 00:13:57.503 as if they were separate telescopes. 319 00:13:57.503 --> 00:13:59.271 We have 18 telescopes basically at this point. 320 00:13:59.271 --> 00:14:01.757 We're going to focus in align each of those telescopes 321 00:14:01.974 --> 00:14:04.643 one by one, using deep focused images to work out 322 00:14:04.643 --> 00:14:07.012 the misalignments of the mirrors and bring them to the point 323 00:14:07.012 --> 00:14:10.649 that each of these 18 telescopes are sharp on their own. 324 00:14:11.300 --> 00:14:13.619 Once we do that, we begin to stack together. 325 00:14:13.886 --> 00:14:16.138 The spots of light 326 00:14:16.138 --> 00:14:18.474 in this we call image stacking produces 327 00:14:18.474 --> 00:14:20.042 something that has the light gathering power 328 00:14:20.042 --> 00:14:22.044 of the full telescope, but not yet the sharpness. 329 00:14:23.162 --> 00:14:24.713 We still have the mirrors misaligned 330 00:14:24.713 --> 00:14:27.900 by some hundreds of microns at this point in the process. 331 00:14:28.100 --> 00:14:30.085 And we need to refine that alignment 332 00:14:30.085 --> 00:14:32.037 through a series of additional measurement steps and measure. 333 00:14:32.037 --> 00:14:33.505 Correct. Measure, correct. 334 00:14:33.505 --> 00:14:35.507 We use several different measurement techniques. 335 00:14:35.524 --> 00:14:37.977 We move the pattern of spots around the different parts 336 00:14:37.977 --> 00:14:39.295 of the telescope 337 00:14:39.295 --> 00:14:40.713 in order to measure the secondary mirror 338 00:14:40.713 --> 00:14:42.481 alignment between the center in the corners 339 00:14:42.481 --> 00:14:44.099 of the field of view. 340 00:14:44.099 --> 00:14:47.219 We use a prism to split the light 341 00:14:47.219 --> 00:14:50.906 from pairs of segments and measure the piston offsets. 342 00:14:51.123 --> 00:14:52.675 We can then correct those piston offsets 343 00:14:52.675 --> 00:14:54.960 to bring the mirrors in interphase with one another. 344 00:14:55.494 --> 00:14:58.547 And at the end of the process we use a set of the focused 345 00:14:58.847 --> 00:15:01.550 images that we take using lenses we put in the beam. 346 00:15:01.867 --> 00:15:03.719 This is sort of like being at the eye doctor 347 00:15:03.719 --> 00:15:05.537 and you test different lenses and see how 348 00:15:06.572 --> 00:15:09.091 they work And here we're using computer 349 00:15:09.091 --> 00:15:12.111 and mathematical analysis to use those defocus images 350 00:15:12.895 --> 00:15:15.898 to measure the mirror positions with the precision 351 00:15:15.898 --> 00:15:17.583 of just nanometers. 352 00:15:17.583 --> 00:15:21.020 And we use that to dial in these these very fine adjustments 353 00:15:22.554 --> 00:15:24.173 that bring the telescope into it. 354 00:15:24.173 --> 00:15:27.026 Just an exquisite sharpness. 355 00:15:27.026 --> 00:15:28.877 This is a process that we've prepared 356 00:15:28.877 --> 00:15:31.647 and practiced for years 357 00:15:31.647 --> 00:15:32.281 and and 358 00:15:32.281 --> 00:15:34.049 we've rehearsed over the last few years, 359 00:15:34.049 --> 00:15:36.118 and now we've had a chance to run that plan. 360 00:15:36.118 --> 00:15:38.570 And it's just an absolute thrill to be able to say 361 00:15:38.871 --> 00:15:40.022 that everything worked. 362 00:15:40.022 --> 00:15:43.492 And the telescope, at no point in that process 363 00:15:43.492 --> 00:15:44.910 did we have any significant 364 00:15:44.910 --> 00:15:47.363 technical issues with the telescope. 365 00:15:47.363 --> 00:15:49.465 Everything's performing at or above the expectations. 366 00:15:49.465 --> 00:15:50.783 As we said, 367 00:15:50.883 --> 00:15:51.717 there were a couple of places 368 00:15:51.717 --> 00:15:54.236 with some surprises in the data, but little surprises. 369 00:15:54.386 --> 00:15:55.738 The biggest one, honestly, has been 370 00:15:55.738 --> 00:15:59.041 just how closely it matched the models and the predictions 371 00:15:59.491 --> 00:16:00.209 from the ground. 372 00:16:00.209 --> 00:16:02.962 It has been far closer to those predictions than than 373 00:16:02.962 --> 00:16:04.413 a lot of us had dared to hope. 374 00:16:04.413 --> 00:16:06.949 And we now have achieved what's called diffraction 375 00:16:06.949 --> 00:16:08.450 limited alignment of the telescope. 376 00:16:08.450 --> 00:16:10.502 The images are focused together 377 00:16:10.803 --> 00:16:13.522 as finely as the laws of physics allow. 378 00:16:13.739 --> 00:16:14.540 This is a sharpened 379 00:16:14.540 --> 00:16:17.126 image as you can get from a telescope of this size. 380 00:16:18.027 --> 00:16:20.062 And as we were focusing the telescope, 381 00:16:20.062 --> 00:16:22.581 we were using typically one or Bright Star at a time, 382 00:16:22.614 --> 00:16:24.717 a handful of different stars we used on the sky. 383 00:16:24.717 --> 00:16:26.869 But as we were focusing on those bright stars, we couldn't help 384 00:16:26.869 --> 00:16:30.322 but see the rest of the universe coming into focus behind them 385 00:16:30.539 --> 00:16:33.709 to see the more distant stars and galaxies coming into view. 386 00:16:33.959 --> 00:16:36.061 And honestly, the team was giddy at times 387 00:16:36.061 --> 00:16:37.262 just seeing this happen. 388 00:16:37.262 --> 00:16:38.847 There's no way to look at these data 389 00:16:38.847 --> 00:16:41.100 and not be excited at the scientific possibilities 390 00:16:41.300 --> 00:16:43.102 that are opening up here. 391 00:16:43.102 --> 00:16:45.954 We've done this over the last several months. 392 00:16:46.622 --> 00:16:49.008 Within almost exactly on schedule. 393 00:16:49.008 --> 00:16:50.492 There is a few things 394 00:16:50.492 --> 00:16:52.127 that took a little bit longer than we thought. 395 00:16:52.127 --> 00:16:53.846 There are some steps that went faster than we thought. 396 00:16:53.846 --> 00:16:54.863 And so overall, 397 00:16:54.863 --> 00:16:56.215 we're really within just a few days 398 00:16:56.215 --> 00:16:58.217 of exactly where we thought we'd be at this point 399 00:16:58.217 --> 00:16:59.451 about three months after launch. 400 00:16:59.451 --> 00:17:01.620 And that sets us up to be on track 401 00:17:01.770 --> 00:17:03.088 for completing the rest of commissioning 402 00:17:03.088 --> 00:17:04.490 within the six months after launch 403 00:17:04.490 --> 00:17:06.842 and turning over to science starting that summer. 404 00:17:07.443 --> 00:17:08.694 So it's an amazing place to be. 405 00:17:10.679 --> 00:17:11.997 Thank you so much, Marshall. 406 00:17:11.997 --> 00:17:14.033 We have one more speaker to talk a little bit 407 00:17:14.033 --> 00:17:16.101 about that science that Marshall was discussing. 408 00:17:16.101 --> 00:17:18.687 But just a reminder, after that, we will be taking questions 409 00:17:18.921 --> 00:17:20.072 from media on the line. 410 00:17:20.072 --> 00:17:22.674 You can press star one to get into the queue 411 00:17:22.858 --> 00:17:25.944 and for social media, post your questions with the hashtag 412 00:17:26.311 --> 00:17:27.830 unfold the universe. 413 00:17:27.830 --> 00:17:28.764 Thank you so much. 414 00:17:28.764 --> 00:17:32.151 Next, we have Jane Rigby from NASA's Goddard. 415 00:17:32.418 --> 00:17:33.752 Thank you, Karen. 416 00:17:33.752 --> 00:17:36.355 So you've you've heard from the other speakers, 417 00:17:36.355 --> 00:17:37.439 but I'm just going to say it again. 418 00:17:37.439 --> 00:17:39.058 The telescope performance 419 00:17:39.058 --> 00:17:41.660 so far is everything that we dared hope. 420 00:17:42.061 --> 00:17:43.712 The optics work. 421 00:17:43.712 --> 00:17:46.799 The goal here was to build a telescope 100 times 422 00:17:46.799 --> 00:17:49.468 more powerful than anything we've had before 423 00:17:49.952 --> 00:17:53.422 from the early engineering data that we have seen so far. 424 00:17:53.455 --> 00:17:56.091 We know that we're on track to meet 425 00:17:56.091 --> 00:17:58.277 those very demanding science requirements. 426 00:17:58.977 --> 00:18:01.697 The engineering images that we saw today 427 00:18:02.631 --> 00:18:05.400 are as sharp and as crisp 428 00:18:05.400 --> 00:18:07.519 as the images that Hubble can take, 429 00:18:07.519 --> 00:18:10.289 but are at a wavelength of light that is totally invisible 430 00:18:10.289 --> 00:18:11.123 to Hubble. 431 00:18:11.123 --> 00:18:13.308 So this is making the invisible universe 432 00:18:13.559 --> 00:18:16.345 snap into very, very sharp focus. 433 00:18:16.795 --> 00:18:19.014 The requirement was to get to the diffraction 434 00:18:19.014 --> 00:18:20.282 limit at two microns. 435 00:18:20.282 --> 00:18:24.403 We nailed it for the astronomers who are listening to microns, 436 00:18:24.419 --> 00:18:24.770 the point 437 00:18:24.770 --> 00:18:28.657 spread function has a full width at half max of 2.3 pixels. 438 00:18:28.941 --> 00:18:31.009 That's 70 billion arcseconds. 439 00:18:31.009 --> 00:18:33.779 The only way to make those images sharper is to just 440 00:18:34.046 --> 00:18:34.997 make a bigger mirror. 441 00:18:36.331 --> 00:18:37.049 Now, we took this 442 00:18:37.049 --> 00:18:39.301 image to characterize the sharpness, 443 00:18:39.568 --> 00:18:42.838 but you can't help but see those thousands of galaxies 444 00:18:42.838 --> 00:18:43.889 behind it, right? 445 00:18:43.889 --> 00:18:45.958 They're really gorgeous. 446 00:18:45.958 --> 00:18:47.726 Webb can't. 447 00:18:47.726 --> 00:18:50.062 There's no way that Webb can look for 12 seconds 448 00:18:50.062 --> 00:18:53.148 at any point in the sky and not go incredibly deep. 449 00:18:53.782 --> 00:18:56.969 So this is going to be the future from now on, wherever 450 00:18:56.969 --> 00:18:57.503 we look. 451 00:18:57.503 --> 00:18:59.188 It's a deep field 452 00:18:59.271 --> 00:19:02.274 where Webb is seeing back in time to galaxies 453 00:19:02.274 --> 00:19:05.511 that we're seeing that light as it looked billions of years ago 454 00:19:05.761 --> 00:19:08.397 without even really breaking a sweat. 455 00:19:08.397 --> 00:19:11.416 So where we are right now, we have not taken any science 456 00:19:11.416 --> 00:19:12.234 data yet. 457 00:19:12.234 --> 00:19:14.186 We are still commissioning. 458 00:19:14.186 --> 00:19:16.188 And so what does that mean and what's next? 459 00:19:16.188 --> 00:19:18.707 So right now, the telescope is aligned to near 460 00:19:19.224 --> 00:19:20.959 one of the science instruments. 461 00:19:20.959 --> 00:19:23.629 We now have to align the telescope to all four 462 00:19:23.629 --> 00:19:24.780 of the science instruments. 463 00:19:24.780 --> 00:19:25.614 So every one 464 00:19:25.614 --> 00:19:28.500 of those four instruments is getting a crisp image. 465 00:19:29.034 --> 00:19:30.452 And these four science instruments, 466 00:19:30.452 --> 00:19:32.421 we have to get ready for prime time. 467 00:19:32.421 --> 00:19:34.106 We're getting them ready for science. 468 00:19:34.106 --> 00:19:35.507 One of those four science 469 00:19:35.507 --> 00:19:37.826 instruments, Mary, which eventually is going to be 470 00:19:37.826 --> 00:19:39.661 the coldest thing on the observatory. 471 00:19:39.661 --> 00:19:41.997 It's seven degrees above absolute zero. 472 00:19:42.181 --> 00:19:43.282 It's still cooling. 473 00:19:43.282 --> 00:19:46.018 So we're cooling that instrument and we are taking 474 00:19:46.018 --> 00:19:48.387 the science instruments through their checkout period. 475 00:19:48.737 --> 00:19:51.773 And so, you know, this is the process that we 476 00:19:52.291 --> 00:19:55.344 this is the process where we know that, yes, this is 477 00:19:55.344 --> 00:19:57.296 these instruments are working 478 00:19:57.296 --> 00:19:59.631 to do the science that we need them to do. 479 00:19:59.631 --> 00:20:03.468 So the transition to science will happen in July 480 00:20:03.468 --> 00:20:06.355 where we finished commissioning and we move into 481 00:20:06.355 --> 00:20:10.108 a very demanding year of science operations. 482 00:20:10.108 --> 00:20:13.195 We have already selected it's prepared and ready to go. 483 00:20:13.462 --> 00:20:15.981 A year of really compelling, 484 00:20:15.981 --> 00:20:18.300 demanding science with this telescope. 485 00:20:18.800 --> 00:20:21.770 And I'm just so excited to see the science which was 486 00:20:21.770 --> 00:20:23.522 competitively selected. Right. 487 00:20:23.522 --> 00:20:25.908 We received more than a thousand proposals. 488 00:20:26.124 --> 00:20:28.343 We picked the very best ones 489 00:20:28.343 --> 00:20:31.463 so that science is going to be studying galaxies 490 00:20:31.797 --> 00:20:33.799 that where we're seeing the light 491 00:20:33.799 --> 00:20:36.451 as we're seeing these galaxies, they're so far away 492 00:20:36.868 --> 00:20:39.588 that we see them as they looked only a couple hundred 493 00:20:39.588 --> 00:20:43.592 million years after the Big Bang So we're seeing back in time. 494 00:20:43.609 --> 00:20:44.610 This is what we're going to be 495 00:20:44.610 --> 00:20:48.063 doing in Cycle one to understand how 496 00:20:48.830 --> 00:20:50.599 how galaxies like our own 497 00:20:50.599 --> 00:20:53.852 Milky Way formed and then evolved over 498 00:20:53.869 --> 00:20:56.421 13.7 billion years of cosmic time. 499 00:20:57.155 --> 00:21:00.892 Webb will be studying planets that orbit other stars 500 00:21:01.460 --> 00:21:03.679 And more than that, we'll be able to study 501 00:21:03.679 --> 00:21:07.099 the atmospheres of those planets to understand 502 00:21:07.099 --> 00:21:08.200 what they're made of. 503 00:21:08.200 --> 00:21:11.036 You know, a lot of our science is going to be understood 504 00:21:11.603 --> 00:21:14.539 What stuff is made out through a process called spectroscopy? 505 00:21:14.990 --> 00:21:16.675 What are the atmospheres made of? 506 00:21:16.675 --> 00:21:18.660 What are galaxies made of? 507 00:21:18.660 --> 00:21:21.263 Fundamentally, this telescope is going to explore 508 00:21:21.513 --> 00:21:23.732 how we got here and what's out there 509 00:21:24.499 --> 00:21:27.252 and what's out there in our gorgeous universe. 510 00:21:27.269 --> 00:21:29.388 And that's just starting to come into view now. 511 00:21:33.475 --> 00:21:35.360 Thank you so much, Jane. 512 00:21:35.360 --> 00:21:38.096 We are going to move on to the question and answer portion. 513 00:21:38.397 --> 00:21:41.433 We're going to open up the mikes 514 00:21:41.433 --> 00:21:43.769 for the first question, please 515 00:21:51.410 --> 00:21:52.828 If we don't have our first question, 516 00:21:52.828 --> 00:21:55.163 I can pull up a social media question, but let me know 517 00:22:00.686 --> 00:22:01.136 I'm going to go 518 00:22:01.136 --> 00:22:03.171 to social media question while we work that out. 519 00:22:03.989 --> 00:22:06.658 We have a question from Peter on Facebook. 520 00:22:07.042 --> 00:22:07.826 Who is asking, 521 00:22:07.826 --> 00:22:11.480 what about pointing the telescope at different stars? 522 00:22:11.747 --> 00:22:12.831 How is it going to rotate? 523 00:22:12.831 --> 00:22:14.966 Are there actuate or is to facilitate this? 524 00:22:14.966 --> 00:22:17.069 Or does the entire spacecraft move? 525 00:22:18.754 --> 00:22:21.890 You won't take it or say yeah or 526 00:22:21.890 --> 00:22:23.508 so the way Webb moves 527 00:22:23.508 --> 00:22:25.344 that some people think the telescope moves 528 00:22:25.344 --> 00:22:27.179 with respect to the sunshield, but that's not the case. 529 00:22:27.179 --> 00:22:29.931 The telescope and the sunshield all move as a single object. 530 00:22:29.931 --> 00:22:31.500 So the whole observatory 531 00:22:31.500 --> 00:22:33.719 tips and tilts to move across the sky. 532 00:22:33.952 --> 00:22:35.270 The way that happens is there's a thing 533 00:22:35.270 --> 00:22:37.105 called reaction wheels these are, in essence, 534 00:22:37.105 --> 00:22:39.708 big spinning wheels, like a gyroscope within the body 535 00:22:39.708 --> 00:22:40.709 of the observatory, 536 00:22:40.709 --> 00:22:41.760 and they spin one way 537 00:22:41.760 --> 00:22:43.879 to spin the whole telescope the other way, 538 00:22:43.879 --> 00:22:46.348 and that lets the telescope track across the sky. 539 00:22:46.498 --> 00:22:48.083 We then have a fine guidance sensor. 540 00:22:49.051 --> 00:22:51.169 That was the contribution from the Canadian Space Agency 541 00:22:51.169 --> 00:22:53.722 that locks on stars and stabilizes the images, 542 00:22:53.972 --> 00:22:57.809 moving a mirror that adjusts within the third mirror, within 543 00:22:59.094 --> 00:23:01.346 the fourth mirror, within the telescope, 544 00:23:01.346 --> 00:23:03.031 tips and tilts in response to the signals 545 00:23:03.031 --> 00:23:05.333 in the fine guidance sensor to lock onto the different stars 546 00:23:05.634 --> 00:23:08.103 And that's also something we've tested out over the last 547 00:23:08.103 --> 00:23:10.589 few weeks, and it's working very well at this point. 548 00:23:11.273 --> 00:23:12.741 Great. Thank you so much. 549 00:23:12.741 --> 00:23:14.993 We seem to have worked out the problem 550 00:23:14.993 --> 00:23:16.878 with the phone lines, but they should be on now. 551 00:23:16.878 --> 00:23:19.047 So we'll take the first question. 552 00:23:19.347 --> 00:23:20.999 And our first question comes from 553 00:23:20.999 --> 00:23:23.668 Seth Bornstein from the Associated Press. 554 00:23:23.702 --> 00:23:25.737 Your line is now open 555 00:23:26.121 --> 00:23:27.923 Yes. Thank you for doing this. 556 00:23:27.923 --> 00:23:30.075 I guess this is for James 557 00:23:31.126 --> 00:23:32.277 first image. 558 00:23:32.277 --> 00:23:34.946 Can you tell us what star is this? 559 00:23:34.946 --> 00:23:36.748 How far away is this? 560 00:23:36.748 --> 00:23:39.050 Is this as this star been seen 561 00:23:39.050 --> 00:23:41.103 with Hubble or any other telescope? 562 00:23:41.453 --> 00:23:44.606 And what is the difference between the image you're showing 563 00:23:44.606 --> 00:23:47.309 and whatever knowledge we've had in the past 564 00:23:48.727 --> 00:23:50.362 year or so? 565 00:23:50.362 --> 00:23:55.250 Is that that and how much in the past is this star 566 00:23:55.550 --> 00:23:57.986 and how many galaxies are we seeing in the background? 567 00:23:58.286 --> 00:23:58.970 Sure. 568 00:23:58.970 --> 00:24:02.007 So we sort of plucked this star out of obscurity, 569 00:24:02.607 --> 00:24:04.409 minding its own business. 570 00:24:04.409 --> 00:24:05.160 It is point. 571 00:24:05.160 --> 00:24:08.730 It is up looking out of the plane of our solar system. 572 00:24:09.047 --> 00:24:11.032 And we picked it because it was convenient 573 00:24:11.032 --> 00:24:12.467 for the wavefront folks. 574 00:24:12.467 --> 00:24:15.704 It is a nice, boring star of about the right brightness 575 00:24:15.954 --> 00:24:17.606 brightness. And it's off by itself 576 00:24:17.606 --> 00:24:19.374 with no other bright stars nearby. 577 00:24:19.374 --> 00:24:21.927 It's a pretty much generic anonymous star in the sky. 578 00:24:22.227 --> 00:24:22.978 That worked 579 00:24:22.978 --> 00:24:24.362 well for the kind of sensing measurements 580 00:24:24.362 --> 00:24:26.915 we needed to do the brightness of that star. 581 00:24:26.932 --> 00:24:30.469 It's about a hundred times fainter than the visible 582 00:24:30.569 --> 00:24:31.937 than the human eye could see. 583 00:24:31.937 --> 00:24:32.721 And that's the one that looks 584 00:24:32.721 --> 00:24:34.256 so blindingly bright in this image 585 00:24:34.256 --> 00:24:36.391 to get a sense of how sensitive the telescope is. 586 00:24:37.225 --> 00:24:37.909 I don't know. 587 00:24:37.909 --> 00:24:40.312 I can get back to you on how far away that that star is, 588 00:24:40.312 --> 00:24:42.931 but we think it's sort of just a generic 589 00:24:42.931 --> 00:24:45.167 average star in our inner galaxy. 590 00:24:45.567 --> 00:24:47.853 And then the the what was known behind that, 591 00:24:47.853 --> 00:24:49.971 because this isn't a famous deep field. 592 00:24:49.971 --> 00:24:53.241 This is just we've made we've made it a fairly deep field, 593 00:24:53.241 --> 00:24:54.543 but it was just a star. 594 00:24:54.543 --> 00:24:56.995 So the brightest stars in that image are known in 595 00:24:56.995 --> 00:24:58.079 previous study 596 00:24:58.079 --> 00:25:01.283 surveys, the brightest galaxies, everything else there is new 597 00:25:02.350 --> 00:25:03.718 So I'll just add once again, 598 00:25:03.718 --> 00:25:06.087 this star is one of many stars we used throughout 599 00:25:06.087 --> 00:25:08.190 the commissioning process of of Webb. 600 00:25:08.423 --> 00:25:10.458 We've gotten a lot of questions about the stars we're using. 601 00:25:10.825 --> 00:25:12.410 They're generally picked out 602 00:25:12.410 --> 00:25:13.879 not because they're special stars, 603 00:25:13.879 --> 00:25:15.830 but because they're the right brightness 604 00:25:15.830 --> 00:25:18.750 in the right parts of sky for our engineering tests. 605 00:25:19.017 --> 00:25:21.803 They're intentionally, at this point, not special stars. 606 00:25:21.803 --> 00:25:22.137 They're just 607 00:25:22.137 --> 00:25:24.272 here's a generic star we can use to focus the telescope. 608 00:25:25.407 --> 00:25:26.591 Thank you very much. 609 00:25:26.591 --> 00:25:29.477 We will go on to our next question, please. 610 00:25:29.477 --> 00:25:31.796 Our next question is from Chris Jabour. 611 00:25:31.846 --> 00:25:33.448 From NASA's space flight. 612 00:25:33.448 --> 00:25:35.483 Your line is now open. 613 00:25:35.901 --> 00:25:37.402 I can. Yes. 614 00:25:37.402 --> 00:25:38.169 Thank you so much. 615 00:25:38.169 --> 00:25:40.672 I'm wondering, looking out a little bit ahead 616 00:25:41.122 --> 00:25:43.608 to the rest of the Mira alignment, 617 00:25:43.625 --> 00:25:45.627 you mentioned that you have to align it 618 00:25:45.627 --> 00:25:47.062 to each of the instruments. 619 00:25:47.062 --> 00:25:49.014 So I'm wondering 620 00:25:50.899 --> 00:25:53.451 if each time the telescope observes something, 621 00:25:53.451 --> 00:25:56.988 do you have to basically realign it to each of the instruments, 622 00:25:56.988 --> 00:26:01.309 or are you trying to find a one alignment that works for them? 623 00:26:01.409 --> 00:26:04.479 All. And in particular, 624 00:26:04.479 --> 00:26:07.132 like how would that work going forward with practical 625 00:26:07.132 --> 00:26:09.834 observations in terms of seeing all the way back 626 00:26:10.352 --> 00:26:13.255 and seeing very, very close objects in our own solar system? 627 00:26:14.155 --> 00:26:15.574 Thank you. Question. 628 00:26:15.574 --> 00:26:16.408 Yeah, I can answer that. 629 00:26:16.408 --> 00:26:17.909 That's a good question. 630 00:26:18.293 --> 00:26:20.428 You know, we we initially lines to near Cam 631 00:26:21.029 --> 00:26:23.181 as an instrument because it has that's 632 00:26:23.481 --> 00:26:26.151 some of those special optics in their filter wheel 633 00:26:26.151 --> 00:26:28.853 that Marshall mentioned just for our alignment process. 634 00:26:28.970 --> 00:26:29.971 Now that we've gone through 635 00:26:29.971 --> 00:26:32.274 that fine alignment process with your cam, 636 00:26:32.641 --> 00:26:35.910 we will take a look at the other instruments 637 00:26:35.910 --> 00:26:39.497 across the field of view and we'll balance the alignment 638 00:26:39.497 --> 00:26:43.768 of the entire telescope up to all four of the instruments 639 00:26:45.120 --> 00:26:45.587 so that they're 640 00:26:45.587 --> 00:26:47.939 all in focus and they're all nice and sharp. 641 00:26:48.657 --> 00:26:50.809 But once we're done with that process, 642 00:26:51.059 --> 00:26:53.428 then we leave it alone basically. 643 00:26:53.428 --> 00:26:56.548 And we only do maintenance operations is what we call them. 644 00:26:56.698 --> 00:26:58.617 So every couple of days we'll take a measurement 645 00:26:58.617 --> 00:27:01.519 and see how the alignment looks see how the wavefront looks, 646 00:27:01.770 --> 00:27:05.156 and if it's drifted a little bit, maybe for thermal drifts 647 00:27:05.156 --> 00:27:06.207 or other reasons, 648 00:27:06.207 --> 00:27:09.327 then we can make a tiny correction we'll still be making 649 00:27:09.327 --> 00:27:12.147 on the nanometer size moves at that point. 650 00:27:12.147 --> 00:27:14.783 So we won't be realigning the telescope. 651 00:27:15.383 --> 00:27:18.053 We'll just keep it in focus and maintain it 652 00:27:18.153 --> 00:27:20.005 throughout mission life. 653 00:27:21.473 --> 00:27:22.107 Thanks. 654 00:27:22.107 --> 00:27:25.043 We are ready for our next question. 655 00:27:25.143 --> 00:27:25.493 Thank you. 656 00:27:25.493 --> 00:27:29.331 Our next question comes from Alisha Belzer from Mashable. 657 00:27:29.364 --> 00:27:30.332 Your line is now open. 658 00:27:31.916 --> 00:27:34.469 Hi. Thank you for doing this and congrats. 659 00:27:35.337 --> 00:27:37.889 I was hoping just for the general public, 660 00:27:37.889 --> 00:27:41.359 could you explain the features of the image? 661 00:27:42.027 --> 00:27:45.780 In other words, what's causing those big, bright lights, 662 00:27:45.830 --> 00:27:49.100 structures and what's giving the image its red color? 663 00:27:49.517 --> 00:27:50.251 Thanks. 664 00:27:50.452 --> 00:27:50.985 Yeah. 665 00:27:51.119 --> 00:27:52.921 So I can help you a little bit. 666 00:27:52.921 --> 00:27:54.422 So first of all, 667 00:27:54.673 --> 00:27:57.509 the the color that's actually the colors that we used. 668 00:27:57.709 --> 00:28:00.211 The engineers use to to display it. 669 00:28:00.211 --> 00:28:02.030 But the actual light that's coming in 670 00:28:02.030 --> 00:28:02.897 is infrared light, 671 00:28:02.897 --> 00:28:05.266 which you would not normally be able to see with your eye. 672 00:28:05.600 --> 00:28:07.769 So we wound up using red 673 00:28:08.336 --> 00:28:10.622 to help us see the contrast in the image. 674 00:28:10.822 --> 00:28:13.074 And that's what we're displaying here. 675 00:28:13.074 --> 00:28:15.677 But in terms of what you're that the spikes that you see 676 00:28:15.677 --> 00:28:17.479 coming out of the star, 677 00:28:17.479 --> 00:28:20.281 any telescope that has special structures 678 00:28:20.281 --> 00:28:22.200 like this, the shape of our mirrors 679 00:28:22.200 --> 00:28:24.469 will have that kind of spikes in it. 680 00:28:24.803 --> 00:28:25.403 Those are actually 681 00:28:25.403 --> 00:28:28.323 the result of, in this case, having hexagonal segments 682 00:28:28.673 --> 00:28:30.442 So we have these six sided mirrors 683 00:28:30.442 --> 00:28:33.328 and we also have our struts are the things that hold 684 00:28:33.328 --> 00:28:34.612 the secondary mirror up. 685 00:28:34.612 --> 00:28:38.516 And because of the sort of the way that light travels 686 00:28:38.516 --> 00:28:41.102 and that actually causes something called diffraction 687 00:28:41.336 --> 00:28:42.387 that makes those spikes. 688 00:28:42.387 --> 00:28:44.372 And you see that most intensely 689 00:28:44.372 --> 00:28:45.890 when you have a very bright star 690 00:28:45.890 --> 00:28:47.192 and the other stars in the field, 691 00:28:47.192 --> 00:28:49.427 you don't see it as much because they're dimmer. 692 00:28:49.427 --> 00:28:52.046 And those effects are much harder to see. 693 00:28:52.046 --> 00:28:54.032 And that's why you only see it in that very bright star. 694 00:28:55.950 --> 00:28:58.286 Thank you so much, Marshall. 695 00:28:58.286 --> 00:29:00.805 We are going to continue with some more media questions. 696 00:29:00.805 --> 00:29:04.058 Next ones up All right. 697 00:29:04.075 --> 00:29:07.262 And our next question is from Bill Harwood from CBS News. 698 00:29:07.278 --> 00:29:09.197 Your line is open. 699 00:29:09.380 --> 00:29:11.132 Hey, thank you very much. 700 00:29:11.132 --> 00:29:13.051 Yeah, I just want to follow up on an earlier question 701 00:29:13.051 --> 00:29:15.170 because I'm still a little bit confused about 702 00:29:16.521 --> 00:29:19.140 the alignment to date and then what has to be done 703 00:29:19.140 --> 00:29:20.425 for the other instruments. 704 00:29:20.425 --> 00:29:23.061 So I'm taking it that you're perfectly aligned 705 00:29:23.311 --> 00:29:25.764 there have been the focus is a sharp, 706 00:29:27.031 --> 00:29:29.117 sharp as you can get it. 707 00:29:29.634 --> 00:29:31.286 But are you moving? 708 00:29:31.286 --> 00:29:31.970 I don't understand. 709 00:29:31.970 --> 00:29:32.971 If it's the secondary 710 00:29:32.971 --> 00:29:36.357 that you remove at this point or individual segments to it 711 00:29:36.508 --> 00:29:38.543 to achieve that focus for everybody. 712 00:29:39.527 --> 00:29:41.996 I guess I'm just not visualizing how that works 713 00:29:42.380 --> 00:29:46.501 or how the internal mirrors and will play into all of that. 714 00:29:47.569 --> 00:29:48.236 Thanks. 715 00:29:48.319 --> 00:29:48.887 So the 716 00:29:48.887 --> 00:29:51.890 primary things we're doing that are still in front of us. 717 00:29:52.257 --> 00:29:55.193 The secondary mirror right now is actually fairly well aligned. 718 00:29:55.860 --> 00:29:59.514 And we know not we know that not just because of the star 719 00:29:59.514 --> 00:30:00.348 that we just showed you, 720 00:30:00.348 --> 00:30:02.417 but the other stars in that field 721 00:30:02.700 --> 00:30:04.319 tell us it's pretty well aligned. 722 00:30:04.319 --> 00:30:06.237 But we want to we want to make it 723 00:30:06.237 --> 00:30:07.405 as good as possible 724 00:30:07.405 --> 00:30:09.174 so that it's balance for all four instruments. 725 00:30:09.174 --> 00:30:11.659 So we do we do have to do a little bit of 726 00:30:12.744 --> 00:30:15.063 very small tweaks to the secondary mirror alignment 727 00:30:15.363 --> 00:30:17.065 and then also the instruments themselves. 728 00:30:17.065 --> 00:30:17.966 Several of the instruments 729 00:30:17.966 --> 00:30:20.602 have the ability to focus internally to the instrument, 730 00:30:20.852 --> 00:30:21.452 and that's something 731 00:30:21.452 --> 00:30:23.521 we still need to do is to get them focused 732 00:30:23.721 --> 00:30:25.523 once the telescope itself 733 00:30:25.523 --> 00:30:27.592 is fully aligned and fully focused in a way 734 00:30:27.592 --> 00:30:29.460 that balances off our instruments. 735 00:30:29.460 --> 00:30:31.646 It's a very minor change that's in front of us. 736 00:30:31.646 --> 00:30:34.349 But when you're trying to do sort of transformative science, 737 00:30:34.349 --> 00:30:37.218 you have to really get to the ultimate performance. 738 00:30:37.218 --> 00:30:40.471 And it'll be a few weeks to do this, but we will be able 739 00:30:40.471 --> 00:30:43.258 to leave the telescope from that time forward. 740 00:30:46.010 --> 00:30:47.762 Thank you so much. 741 00:30:49.163 --> 00:30:50.398 And we will move on to our next 742 00:30:50.398 --> 00:30:52.951 question, please, from the media. 743 00:30:52.951 --> 00:30:56.671 Our next question comes from Eileen Woodward from WSJ. 744 00:30:56.688 --> 00:30:58.857 Your line is now open. 745 00:30:59.357 --> 00:31:00.859 Hi. Thank you so much for this. 746 00:31:00.859 --> 00:31:03.511 I just wanted to ask, 747 00:31:03.511 --> 00:31:06.231 do you think that you have sort of passed the performance 748 00:31:06.231 --> 00:31:09.751 Rubicon in terms of between now and June 749 00:31:09.751 --> 00:31:12.503 and July, when you expect to start scientific observations 750 00:31:12.503 --> 00:31:15.840 and see first imagery of that deep universe? 751 00:31:16.307 --> 00:31:18.943 Do you anticipate any problems between then and now? 752 00:31:19.160 --> 00:31:21.746 It seems to me like coarse and fine phrasing were sort of 753 00:31:22.530 --> 00:31:26.084 the big thing that we wanted to achieve, and you've done so. 754 00:31:26.167 --> 00:31:29.220 I'm curious if you anticipate any issues between now and then. 755 00:31:29.971 --> 00:31:32.574 We'll start out with Thomas for that question. 756 00:31:32.574 --> 00:31:35.043 So I'm really interested in other answers Actually, 757 00:31:35.276 --> 00:31:38.997 I just want to tell you, of all the sleepless nights 758 00:31:38.997 --> 00:31:41.132 I've had and kind of the worries I've had 759 00:31:41.249 --> 00:31:42.984 that are all behind us now, 760 00:31:42.984 --> 00:31:45.453 and it's not because there is no path ahead. 761 00:31:45.453 --> 00:31:47.005 There's still a mountain to climb. 762 00:31:47.005 --> 00:31:49.607 There are important tasks that need to be done 763 00:31:49.791 --> 00:31:51.593 and important things that need to be proven, 764 00:31:51.593 --> 00:31:54.979 such as the alignment, as I was also all the modalities in each 765 00:31:54.979 --> 00:31:58.549 one of the instruments needs to be tested and calibrated. 766 00:31:58.850 --> 00:32:01.252 So there's important stuff ahead. 767 00:32:01.252 --> 00:32:05.573 But I want to tell you, you you know, kind of what's behind us. 768 00:32:05.757 --> 00:32:07.592 We're way up that mountain now. 769 00:32:07.592 --> 00:32:08.860 We're way up that mountain. 770 00:32:08.860 --> 00:32:10.111 Yes. There's a path that 771 00:32:10.111 --> 00:32:13.047 and you know, in our world, there's always a path ahead. 772 00:32:13.197 --> 00:32:15.500 We never go say we're done. 773 00:32:15.500 --> 00:32:16.818 We can take it easy now. 774 00:32:16.818 --> 00:32:19.337 So so kind of the way we create success is by, 775 00:32:19.337 --> 00:32:22.256 frankly, focusing on the issues that are still ahead. 776 00:32:22.256 --> 00:32:23.491 And we're worrying about 777 00:32:23.491 --> 00:32:25.576 But I'm interested in other opinions or other 778 00:32:25.576 --> 00:32:26.427 statements to that. 779 00:32:28.012 --> 00:32:30.231 Well, I I do want to say one thing is, 780 00:32:30.231 --> 00:32:33.468 you know, we do know now that we built the right telescope 781 00:32:33.468 --> 00:32:35.820 in terms of the optics, that is not going to change. 782 00:32:36.587 --> 00:32:37.922 And that's something that the fine 783 00:32:37.922 --> 00:32:39.207 phasing process is brought out. 784 00:32:39.207 --> 00:32:41.459 We've been able to analyze those images 785 00:32:41.459 --> 00:32:43.378 and we know we built the right telescope. 786 00:32:43.378 --> 00:32:45.747 And, of course, you know, that's a big deal. 787 00:32:45.780 --> 00:32:48.566 And so so that's partially why we're here today. 788 00:32:49.167 --> 00:32:51.686 But but as Thomas said and others have said, 789 00:32:51.686 --> 00:32:52.854 you know, there is work to go. 790 00:32:52.854 --> 00:32:55.406 So we're not there on the entire observatory. 791 00:32:55.940 --> 00:32:58.459 But just to take that image, you know, that was a 2100 792 00:32:58.509 --> 00:33:00.411 second image. A lot of things had to work. 793 00:33:00.411 --> 00:33:01.379 We had to be able to point, 794 00:33:01.379 --> 00:33:02.363 we had to be able to, 795 00:33:02.363 --> 00:33:05.133 you know, guide, which means kind of track on that star. 796 00:33:05.133 --> 00:33:06.117 Precisely. 797 00:33:06.117 --> 00:33:09.237 It was a fairly long period of time that we took that image. 798 00:33:09.237 --> 00:33:11.239 So there's a lot of things that are working really well, 799 00:33:11.572 --> 00:33:12.774 but there is more work to go. 800 00:33:14.392 --> 00:33:14.842 All right. 801 00:33:14.842 --> 00:33:15.777 Thank you. 802 00:33:15.777 --> 00:33:19.197 We will go to the next question from the phone lines. 803 00:33:19.197 --> 00:33:20.331 And our next question comes 804 00:33:20.331 --> 00:33:23.217 from Alexandria with from Nature magazine. 805 00:33:23.251 --> 00:33:25.286 Your line is now open. 806 00:33:25.470 --> 00:33:26.304 Great. Thank you. 807 00:33:26.304 --> 00:33:28.489 My question is for Jane Rigby. 808 00:33:28.489 --> 00:33:29.424 Can you just 809 00:33:29.424 --> 00:33:32.477 pass forward a little bit more to sort of first science again? 810 00:33:33.111 --> 00:33:35.313 We hear dates of June, July. 811 00:33:35.313 --> 00:33:35.630 Can you 812 00:33:35.630 --> 00:33:38.332 be a little bit more precise on when we'll have more timing 813 00:33:38.332 --> 00:33:41.786 on which of those dates, which of those months is accurate? 814 00:33:41.786 --> 00:33:45.056 And also, what do we know about kind of the super secret 815 00:33:45.056 --> 00:33:47.658 first science observations that are going to be made? 816 00:33:47.658 --> 00:33:49.494 Have those targets been chosen? 817 00:33:49.494 --> 00:33:50.128 I know you can't 818 00:33:50.128 --> 00:33:52.380 tell us what they are, but have those targets been chosen? 819 00:33:52.680 --> 00:33:54.032 Okay. In reverse order? 820 00:33:54.032 --> 00:33:56.818 Yes. The targets have been chosen for the super secret 821 00:33:57.151 --> 00:33:58.970 first images that will be released. 822 00:33:59.937 --> 00:34:02.323 The science targets, of course, have all been chosen. 823 00:34:02.340 --> 00:34:05.126 We've selected more than a full year of science, 824 00:34:05.393 --> 00:34:07.795 and those operate those targets have been chosen 825 00:34:07.795 --> 00:34:10.248 and those programs have been fully specified. 826 00:34:10.431 --> 00:34:13.501 The computer files that tell the little Web 827 00:34:13.501 --> 00:34:16.137 how to take the data, we have all those in hat in hand 828 00:34:16.521 --> 00:34:18.322 As far as the specifics, we are going. 829 00:34:18.322 --> 00:34:20.091 We will start science operations 830 00:34:20.091 --> 00:34:21.709 when we are done with commissioning. 831 00:34:21.709 --> 00:34:24.078 Commissioning is nominally six months long. 832 00:34:24.262 --> 00:34:28.132 We launched on Christmas Day So that would be the end of June 833 00:34:31.619 --> 00:34:31.886 Great. 834 00:34:31.886 --> 00:34:32.970 Thank you. 835 00:34:33.654 --> 00:34:36.741 Moving on to the next question, please. 836 00:34:36.741 --> 00:34:36.991 Right. 837 00:34:36.991 --> 00:34:40.378 And our next question comes from Passant Bobby from Inverse. 838 00:34:40.411 --> 00:34:42.447 Your line is now open. 839 00:34:43.097 --> 00:34:44.849 Thank you. Yes. 840 00:34:44.849 --> 00:34:46.584 I'm wondering, you know, 841 00:34:46.584 --> 00:34:49.771 how have was seen all of these stunning images, images 842 00:34:49.771 --> 00:34:54.025 but with James Webb just looking at more distant objects? 843 00:34:54.509 --> 00:34:57.261 Is there a esthetic value or sort of visual value? 844 00:34:57.562 --> 00:35:01.099 Less important is more about the data with these images 845 00:35:03.868 --> 00:35:04.218 both. 846 00:35:04.218 --> 00:35:08.222 And like I mean, they're gorgeous. 847 00:35:08.823 --> 00:35:12.110 Like, you can't help but enjoy the seeing that this 848 00:35:12.326 --> 00:35:12.977 is part of why 849 00:35:12.977 --> 00:35:15.897 we're all astronomers is to study the stars, 850 00:35:15.897 --> 00:35:18.049 because many of us up here on stage, 851 00:35:18.049 --> 00:35:20.001 you know, looked at the sky as kids or looked at pictures 852 00:35:20.001 --> 00:35:22.436 from Hubble or other telescopes and said, that's amazing. 853 00:35:23.371 --> 00:35:26.057 But in addition, we want to make the technical 854 00:35:26.057 --> 00:35:27.141 scientific measurements 855 00:35:27.141 --> 00:35:30.144 and some of the measurements we make with Web will be, 856 00:35:30.862 --> 00:35:31.129 you know, 857 00:35:31.129 --> 00:35:33.831 not as visually stunning that will be series of lines. 858 00:35:34.098 --> 00:35:36.501 There will be this the spectra, 859 00:35:36.501 --> 00:35:38.486 some of the measurements with Webb will be, I think, 860 00:35:38.486 --> 00:35:41.072 even more stunning multicolor imagery. 861 00:35:41.072 --> 00:35:42.473 We're going to have there's two instruments in Webb 862 00:35:42.473 --> 00:35:44.192 that have what's called the Integral Field Spectrograph 863 00:35:44.192 --> 00:35:45.259 that gives you an image, 864 00:35:45.259 --> 00:35:48.179 but not in three colors, but in thousands of colors at once. 865 00:35:48.179 --> 00:35:50.214 And those are going to be some some really neat data to see. 866 00:35:50.581 --> 00:35:51.933 And that's part of the complexity 867 00:35:51.933 --> 00:35:53.000 with calibrating the instruments. 868 00:35:53.000 --> 00:35:54.001 So I think 869 00:35:54.001 --> 00:35:56.337 just like with Hubble, there are some Hubble images 870 00:35:56.654 --> 00:35:59.490 that we take that do have deep esthetic value 871 00:35:59.724 --> 00:36:02.310 and they have scientific value and it's always a both. 872 00:36:02.310 --> 00:36:06.080 And yeah, and some of what we're getting from the spectroscopy, 873 00:36:06.297 --> 00:36:09.033 you know, we'll be telling you how galaxies are rotating 874 00:36:09.317 --> 00:36:11.969 and how the gas in those galaxies is getting blown 875 00:36:11.969 --> 00:36:15.323 out of them by supernova and will be determining what 876 00:36:15.373 --> 00:36:18.709 the composition of what the gas in galaxies is 877 00:36:18.960 --> 00:36:20.995 and the composition of the atmospheres of planets 878 00:36:20.995 --> 00:36:23.965 so that you know, maybe it's a little bit geekier, 879 00:36:23.965 --> 00:36:26.334 but what you get out of it is really, really cool. 880 00:36:26.551 --> 00:36:29.487 So we will both be doing stuff that makes us giddy and happy 881 00:36:29.487 --> 00:36:29.837 and always 882 00:36:29.837 --> 00:36:32.757 gorgeous and stuff where we say, Oh my God, now we know what. 883 00:36:32.940 --> 00:36:35.209 Now we know what that's made of that we never did before. 884 00:36:37.144 --> 00:36:38.763 It's a great, great answer. 885 00:36:38.763 --> 00:36:39.947 I'm looking for a lot of giddy 886 00:36:39.947 --> 00:36:42.149 and happy as we as we go forward. 887 00:36:43.050 --> 00:36:43.367 All right. 888 00:36:43.367 --> 00:36:45.853 We'll take the next question, please. 889 00:36:45.853 --> 00:36:48.806 Next question comes from George Divorce from Gizmodo. 890 00:36:48.839 --> 00:36:50.875 Your line is now open. 891 00:36:51.842 --> 00:36:53.578 Hey, guys, thank you very much for doing this. 892 00:36:53.578 --> 00:36:57.632 I just want to go back again to any potential issues 893 00:36:57.632 --> 00:37:00.151 that may still be encountered 894 00:37:00.201 --> 00:37:02.687 as the commissioning phase continues. 895 00:37:02.687 --> 00:37:03.271 And I'm just hoping 896 00:37:03.271 --> 00:37:06.057 that you guys could be a bit more specific 897 00:37:06.057 --> 00:37:08.359 in particular when it comes to the instrumentation, 898 00:37:09.543 --> 00:37:11.312 the upcoming steps, are there any, you know, 899 00:37:11.312 --> 00:37:13.648 potential points of failure that could really disrupt 900 00:37:14.282 --> 00:37:16.200 the unveiling of the telescope 901 00:37:16.200 --> 00:37:17.335 and I know that 902 00:37:17.418 --> 00:37:18.686 Tom has already said that nothing's going 903 00:37:18.686 --> 00:37:19.620 to keep him up at night anymore. 904 00:37:19.620 --> 00:37:21.839 But I'm wondering, the rest of the team agrees with that. 905 00:37:21.839 --> 00:37:22.940 Are there any steps 906 00:37:22.940 --> 00:37:25.910 or that are really still kind of harrowing or problematic 907 00:37:25.910 --> 00:37:28.613 that could really disrupt the process? 908 00:37:28.713 --> 00:37:29.163 Thanks, guys. 909 00:37:31.232 --> 00:37:32.300 I could take that. 910 00:37:32.333 --> 00:37:34.919 So, you know, we've had days on this project 911 00:37:34.919 --> 00:37:37.638 where if it didn't work, we were going to go home, right? 912 00:37:37.638 --> 00:37:39.390 If the sunshield hadn't come out, 913 00:37:39.390 --> 00:37:41.242 well, then we don't have a mission. 914 00:37:41.242 --> 00:37:43.527 If the secondary mirror hadn't deployed, 915 00:37:43.761 --> 00:37:45.596 we call it secondary now because it's not important, 916 00:37:45.596 --> 00:37:47.665 but because it's the second after the primary, 917 00:37:47.665 --> 00:37:49.367 if the secondary hadn't come out, 918 00:37:49.367 --> 00:37:51.619 all that beautiful light coming into the primary 919 00:37:51.636 --> 00:37:53.721 was just going to bounce off into space forever. 920 00:37:54.839 --> 00:37:56.057 And we wouldn't detect it. 921 00:37:56.057 --> 00:37:56.841 So there were parts 922 00:37:56.841 --> 00:37:58.009 on this mission where it's like, well, 923 00:37:58.009 --> 00:38:00.361 this is going to work or we're done. 924 00:38:00.361 --> 00:38:01.529 We're past those points. 925 00:38:01.529 --> 00:38:02.997 Now, that's what Thomas was getting at. 926 00:38:02.997 --> 00:38:05.666 And we're now to the stage where if things don't work, 927 00:38:05.666 --> 00:38:07.401 we're looking at degrade. 928 00:38:07.401 --> 00:38:07.618 You know, 929 00:38:07.618 --> 00:38:08.069 we're looking at 930 00:38:08.069 --> 00:38:10.671 partial degradation of the total science return. 931 00:38:11.038 --> 00:38:12.690 We have four science instruments. 932 00:38:12.690 --> 00:38:14.992 All four of them have turned on and said, 933 00:38:15.326 --> 00:38:18.446 hi, our aliveness check says we're okay for some of those. 934 00:38:18.446 --> 00:38:20.331 For three of those instruments, we have data. 935 00:38:20.331 --> 00:38:22.450 They're coming back. Yes. This is looking okay. 936 00:38:22.466 --> 00:38:23.601 It's early days. 937 00:38:23.601 --> 00:38:24.919 Mary has to cool 938 00:38:24.919 --> 00:38:27.855 from it's in the temperatures in the nineties right now. 939 00:38:27.872 --> 00:38:29.340 90 Kelvin. 940 00:38:29.340 --> 00:38:30.241 90 something Kelvin. 941 00:38:30.241 --> 00:38:32.159 It needs to get down to seven Kelvin. 942 00:38:32.159 --> 00:38:34.011 So that's something that I'm looking at right. 943 00:38:34.011 --> 00:38:37.248 This this has this closed circuit refrigerator 944 00:38:37.531 --> 00:38:40.318 that circulates helium to chill Murray 945 00:38:40.318 --> 00:38:42.887 much colder than the rest of the of the science instruments. 946 00:38:43.187 --> 00:38:44.872 So that's something we're okay. 947 00:38:44.872 --> 00:38:45.656 That's a big deal. 948 00:38:45.656 --> 00:38:49.276 We want to get very cold, but we're now looking at where 949 00:38:49.276 --> 00:38:49.877 I mean, yes, 950 00:38:49.877 --> 00:38:53.514 space is a dangerous environment and Webb is up there in space 951 00:38:53.514 --> 00:38:55.349 and every day we have to keep it safe 952 00:38:55.349 --> 00:38:57.501 and there's work to do to do that. 953 00:38:57.501 --> 00:38:59.937 But most of what we're looking at going forward is 954 00:38:59.937 --> 00:39:02.957 if things don't work, we're looking at gradual degradation 955 00:39:02.957 --> 00:39:05.810 of the total return rather than shows over folks. 956 00:39:06.277 --> 00:39:09.230 And the key thing about the telescope is the telescope 957 00:39:09.230 --> 00:39:10.614 feeds all four instruments. 958 00:39:10.614 --> 00:39:12.483 So when the telescope doesn't work, 959 00:39:12.483 --> 00:39:14.668 then that really affects the entire mission. 960 00:39:14.668 --> 00:39:16.103 And we're now beyond that point. 961 00:39:16.103 --> 00:39:19.707 Now, there's always the potential that some subsystem 962 00:39:19.740 --> 00:39:21.992 might not work at some point. 963 00:39:22.309 --> 00:39:23.027 That happens 964 00:39:23.027 --> 00:39:25.162 but we have a lot of redundancy in all 965 00:39:25.162 --> 00:39:26.664 of our electrical systems. 966 00:39:26.664 --> 00:39:29.417 So from the point of view of having a working observatory, 967 00:39:29.717 --> 00:39:32.636 as Jane said, you know, we're in very good shape 968 00:39:32.636 --> 00:39:34.472 and so now we're really going to be focusing 969 00:39:34.472 --> 00:39:36.891 more on individual instruments and bringing them online 970 00:39:39.560 --> 00:39:41.429 Thank you so much. 971 00:39:41.579 --> 00:39:43.697 We will take the next question from the phone lines, please. 972 00:39:44.815 --> 00:39:48.119 Our next question comes from Marina Warren from Atlantic. 973 00:39:48.152 --> 00:39:50.071 Your line is now open. 974 00:39:50.838 --> 00:39:52.289 Hi, everyone. 975 00:39:52.440 --> 00:39:54.809 Can you tell us more about the group that chose 976 00:39:54.809 --> 00:39:57.678 the top secret targets for the first big image release? 977 00:39:58.345 --> 00:39:58.763 How big 978 00:39:58.763 --> 00:40:01.882 is the group who was involved and from which institutions, 979 00:40:02.216 --> 00:40:04.802 and what exactly was the list of targets finalized? 980 00:40:05.302 --> 00:40:07.438 You get back to them. 981 00:40:07.438 --> 00:40:10.458 What I am hearing in the room is that we will get back to you 982 00:40:10.458 --> 00:40:11.125 on that Marina. 983 00:40:11.125 --> 00:40:11.609 I don't know that 984 00:40:11.609 --> 00:40:15.563 we have the exact size and people at our fingertips, 985 00:40:15.563 --> 00:40:17.748 but I will follow up with you when this is over. 986 00:40:17.748 --> 00:40:20.000 You can drop me an email and I will get you what I can on that. 987 00:40:21.152 --> 00:40:22.286 Do you like the second 988 00:40:22.286 --> 00:40:25.706 question, given that we couldn't answer your first? 989 00:40:25.706 --> 00:40:26.490 I do. 990 00:40:26.490 --> 00:40:28.225 Thank you for it. 991 00:40:29.460 --> 00:40:30.628 Can you tell us so we've 992 00:40:30.628 --> 00:40:33.647 heard a bit about the start at the center of this image. 993 00:40:34.048 --> 00:40:35.966 Can you tell us more about the galaxies 994 00:40:35.966 --> 00:40:38.068 that are in the background you know, what, how, 995 00:40:38.552 --> 00:40:41.572 how far they are and how does this compare to how 996 00:40:42.022 --> 00:40:45.893 well we'll see galaxies in the future in a closer. 997 00:40:46.110 --> 00:40:47.812 Well, again, it's all right. 998 00:40:47.812 --> 00:40:49.830 Well, I guess I'm the galaxy geek in this crowd. 999 00:40:50.448 --> 00:40:50.915 Okay. 1000 00:40:50.915 --> 00:40:53.717 So as we said, this wasn't a famous deep field. 1001 00:40:53.717 --> 00:40:54.752 This isn't a place where 1002 00:40:54.752 --> 00:40:57.872 we studied, where we've known what's out there. 1003 00:40:58.772 --> 00:40:59.907 Just eyeballing it. 1004 00:40:59.907 --> 00:41:01.592 I mean, we got those data. 1005 00:41:01.592 --> 00:41:02.943 They came down Saturday night. 1006 00:41:02.943 --> 00:41:06.797 So I was eyeballing them Sunday morning in my pajamas and 1007 00:41:07.498 --> 00:41:09.583 and, yeah, they're like, you know, 1008 00:41:09.583 --> 00:41:12.153 they're several billion light years away, 1009 00:41:12.153 --> 00:41:14.121 but we actually have to take some spectroscopy 1010 00:41:14.121 --> 00:41:16.457 to get you a better answer than that. 1011 00:41:16.457 --> 00:41:19.076 We can do spectroscopy once we get the science 1012 00:41:19.076 --> 00:41:20.427 instruments ready to go. 1013 00:41:20.427 --> 00:41:22.796 And so that's the sort of thing that Webb will be able to do 1014 00:41:22.830 --> 00:41:25.082 once we get into normal science operations 1015 00:41:25.399 --> 00:41:26.901 of the Near Speck instrument. 1016 00:41:26.901 --> 00:41:29.487 Which was made by the European Space Agency, 1017 00:41:29.753 --> 00:41:31.405 has this really cool micro shutter 1018 00:41:31.405 --> 00:41:32.573 array where it has a quarter 1019 00:41:32.573 --> 00:41:34.825 of a million little doors that can open and close. 1020 00:41:35.159 --> 00:41:38.312 And so we can take spectra of dozens of targets 1021 00:41:38.312 --> 00:41:39.647 within that field. 1022 00:41:39.647 --> 00:41:43.200 And so one of the key science capabilities that this telescope 1023 00:41:43.200 --> 00:41:45.920 has is to target a field like that and pick 1024 00:41:45.920 --> 00:41:49.673 the most interesting 30. 40 galaxies and say. 1025 00:41:49.673 --> 00:41:51.141 I want a spectrum of that that that that 1026 00:41:51.141 --> 00:41:53.727 that that that's at that that and with that, you know 1027 00:41:53.727 --> 00:41:56.931 exactly how far away each of those galaxies are. 1028 00:41:56.931 --> 00:41:58.465 And depending how you do it, 1029 00:41:58.465 --> 00:42:00.901 you understand how much heavy elements 1030 00:42:01.435 --> 00:42:04.855 carbon, oxygen, nitrogen those galaxies have relative 1031 00:42:04.855 --> 00:42:05.990 to hydrogen. 1032 00:42:05.990 --> 00:42:09.777 So that tells you how many times the gas in those galaxies 1033 00:42:09.777 --> 00:42:12.663 has gone through stars and then exploded in supernovae. 1034 00:42:14.281 --> 00:42:14.632 It's one 1035 00:42:14.632 --> 00:42:18.085 thing to that which is that we picked this field 1036 00:42:18.085 --> 00:42:21.322 just for the the wavefront sensing calibration. 1037 00:42:21.322 --> 00:42:23.424 It was not chosen for these galaxies, 1038 00:42:23.424 --> 00:42:25.676 but all the data we're taking and commissioning 1039 00:42:25.676 --> 00:42:26.877 is going to be public 1040 00:42:26.877 --> 00:42:29.213 when we get to the end of commissioning in June. 1041 00:42:29.580 --> 00:42:32.516 And so, you know, scientists out there, 1042 00:42:32.750 --> 00:42:34.401 their grad students at some university 1043 00:42:34.401 --> 00:42:36.470 can download these data in June and start 1044 00:42:36.470 --> 00:42:39.056 answering these questions from this and all the other data 1045 00:42:39.206 --> 00:42:41.692 that's taken during this commissioning process. 1046 00:42:41.692 --> 00:42:44.028 June or July, we get to where we get done. 1047 00:42:44.028 --> 00:42:44.328 Yeah. 1048 00:42:44.545 --> 00:42:48.032 When we when we get past that, all of the calibration data, 1049 00:42:48.032 --> 00:42:48.832 including the 1050 00:42:48.832 --> 00:42:52.052 these images around the fine phase and target 1051 00:42:52.052 --> 00:42:53.604 in multiple wavelengths, we're just going 1052 00:42:53.604 --> 00:42:55.923 to let that data out to the scientific community 1053 00:42:55.923 --> 00:42:57.174 along with those other observations. 1054 00:42:58.459 --> 00:42:58.892 All right. 1055 00:42:58.892 --> 00:43:01.345 We are going to take a few of our social media questions now. 1056 00:43:01.345 --> 00:43:02.696 We'll take two. 1057 00:43:02.696 --> 00:43:06.150 The first one is to guarantee on Instagram asks, 1058 00:43:06.383 --> 00:43:09.503 what is the precision between the mirror segments 1059 00:43:09.737 --> 00:43:12.239 now that they are aligned when it comes to the alignment 1060 00:43:14.608 --> 00:43:15.542 Well, do you want to talk to that? 1061 00:43:15.542 --> 00:43:17.711 We in your presentation. 1062 00:43:19.146 --> 00:43:22.916 Oh, so our actuators have a resolution. 1063 00:43:22.916 --> 00:43:25.819 We can move and maintain a motor position 1064 00:43:26.370 --> 00:43:28.372 to about nine to ten nanometers. 1065 00:43:28.706 --> 00:43:31.191 So that's our capability 1066 00:43:32.042 --> 00:43:33.711 and our sensing requirements. 1067 00:43:33.711 --> 00:43:36.480 And our sensing budget means that our we aren't 1068 00:43:36.480 --> 00:43:38.899 actually within ten nanometer segment to segment, 1069 00:43:40.284 --> 00:43:42.603 but we're I think we're down to 40 1070 00:43:43.437 --> 00:43:45.739 where we're below 100 meters easily. 1071 00:43:45.756 --> 00:43:45.956 Yeah. 1072 00:43:45.956 --> 00:43:46.790 We're nothing 1073 00:43:46.790 --> 00:43:49.710 that's over the whole whole telescoping range instruments. 1074 00:43:49.710 --> 00:43:51.862 Whole system with a full system. Yeah. 1075 00:43:51.962 --> 00:43:53.297 So each individual segment 1076 00:43:53.297 --> 00:43:56.300 to the other segment is well under 100 nanometers 1077 00:43:59.253 --> 00:43:59.820 Great. 1078 00:43:59.820 --> 00:44:03.290 Our second social media question is from Brian and 1079 00:44:04.375 --> 00:44:07.311 Brian in motion on Twitter, 1080 00:44:07.378 --> 00:44:10.948 who asks, what, if any, are the lessons learned from Web 1081 00:44:10.948 --> 00:44:13.917 so far that we can take into the next space telescope? 1082 00:44:14.218 --> 00:44:16.253 Are there any things that could be done differently? 1083 00:44:16.920 --> 00:44:17.388 Yeah, 1084 00:44:18.188 --> 00:44:20.958 You know, one thing about Web, I mean, obviously 1085 00:44:20.958 --> 00:44:22.559 it's a super cold telescope, 1086 00:44:22.559 --> 00:44:24.895 and that really drove a lot of the design. 1087 00:44:25.462 --> 00:44:28.582 Of course, that huge sunshield was needed to cool things down, 1088 00:44:28.982 --> 00:44:32.002 but it's also a passively thermal telescope. 1089 00:44:32.002 --> 00:44:35.723 And what that means is that unlike, for example, 1090 00:44:35.723 --> 00:44:36.557 the Keck telescope, 1091 00:44:36.557 --> 00:44:38.158 which is a ground telescope in Hawaii 1092 00:44:38.158 --> 00:44:40.411 where they actively move mirrors, 1093 00:44:40.411 --> 00:44:42.930 the web mirrors are designed to be to always 1094 00:44:42.930 --> 00:44:44.248 just kind of be where they are. 1095 00:44:44.248 --> 00:44:46.767 And then only every few days do we update them. 1096 00:44:47.151 --> 00:44:49.820 And that made a lot of sense for a really cold telescope, 1097 00:44:49.820 --> 00:44:52.806 but it also made it difficult to prove the telescope 1098 00:44:52.806 --> 00:44:53.757 was going to work 1099 00:44:53.757 --> 00:44:55.109 and to design everything 1100 00:44:55.109 --> 00:44:57.478 from the mirrors to the structure that holds it. 1101 00:44:57.478 --> 00:44:59.279 And so one of the things that we think 1102 00:44:59.279 --> 00:45:01.732 in the future for these large segmented telescopes 1103 00:45:01.999 --> 00:45:04.334 is we will make use of the types of things 1104 00:45:04.334 --> 00:45:06.537 that ground telescopes have which are active controls 1105 00:45:06.837 --> 00:45:09.289 and that would make our ability to test it easier 1106 00:45:09.440 --> 00:45:11.909 and it would make it make us also be able to make it 1107 00:45:11.909 --> 00:45:15.145 even finer telescope, which some of the future observatories 1108 00:45:15.145 --> 00:45:18.716 may want to do for example, if you want to study exoplanets, 1109 00:45:19.383 --> 00:45:21.418 particularly Earth like planets around stars, 1110 00:45:21.418 --> 00:45:23.387 which is one of the future missions 1111 00:45:23.387 --> 00:45:26.490 that has been recommended by a National Academy Committee, 1112 00:45:26.690 --> 00:45:27.207 You're going to need 1113 00:45:27.207 --> 00:45:29.960 a very precise mirror service that's extremely stable. 1114 00:45:30.260 --> 00:45:31.612 And so we are going to probably 1115 00:45:31.612 --> 00:45:34.131 want to migrate from this sort of approach 1116 00:45:34.131 --> 00:45:37.251 we took for this very cold teles 1117 00:45:39.470 --> 00:45:39.920 All right. 1118 00:45:39.920 --> 00:45:40.137 We are 1119 00:45:40.137 --> 00:45:42.656 going to move back to the media questions on the phone line. 1120 00:45:42.656 --> 00:45:45.259 We'll take the next question, please. 1121 00:45:45.259 --> 00:45:46.727 And as a reminder, to ask 1122 00:45:46.727 --> 00:45:49.012 a question over the phone, please press star one 1123 00:45:49.263 --> 00:45:52.132 Our next question comes from Ken Kramer from Space Up Close. 1124 00:45:52.533 --> 00:45:54.618 The line is now open 1125 00:45:55.853 --> 00:45:57.438 and vacillations 1126 00:45:57.438 --> 00:46:00.057 on the face itself so far. 1127 00:46:00.057 --> 00:46:01.442 One thing that was really good 1128 00:46:01.442 --> 00:46:03.293 to know was about the amount of cooling, 1129 00:46:03.293 --> 00:46:06.747 how far you almost felt like you're at 90 k now. 1130 00:46:07.281 --> 00:46:10.667 Oh, I'm going to take you to get the seventh day, 1131 00:46:10.734 --> 00:46:14.488 which is the fall and winter 1132 00:46:15.439 --> 00:46:18.075 I want to talk about the commissioning of the space. 1133 00:46:18.509 --> 00:46:20.878 When you get to that. Thank you. 1134 00:46:20.878 --> 00:46:21.779 I'm going to repeat that. 1135 00:46:21.779 --> 00:46:23.297 That can because was a little hard to hear you. 1136 00:46:23.297 --> 00:46:25.532 And here I think the question was how long to get 1137 00:46:25.532 --> 00:46:28.469 from where we are now to the seven degrees Kelvin. 1138 00:46:29.102 --> 00:46:31.772 And also to talk a little bit more about science 1139 00:46:31.772 --> 00:46:33.740 commissioning, commissioning of the science instruments. 1140 00:46:33.740 --> 00:46:34.975 Correct. Yeah. 1141 00:46:34.975 --> 00:46:36.593 I mean, yes, that's it. Thank you. 1142 00:46:36.593 --> 00:46:37.494 Great. Thank you. 1143 00:46:38.545 --> 00:46:40.948 So so the cooling process 1144 00:46:41.882 --> 00:46:44.334 takes a couple of weeks and and so 1145 00:46:44.334 --> 00:46:45.769 and we actually will be using 1146 00:46:45.769 --> 00:46:48.572 once we have that Mid-infrared instrument 1147 00:46:49.072 --> 00:46:52.009 fully operational, we actually will use it 1148 00:46:52.009 --> 00:46:54.812 to make sure that the telescopes bounce sort of the last step, 1149 00:46:55.496 --> 00:46:56.730 which, you know, our target 1150 00:46:56.730 --> 00:46:58.048 was to finish in the end of April, 1151 00:46:58.048 --> 00:47:00.200 but it takes a couple of weeks to do the cool down 1152 00:47:00.200 --> 00:47:01.802 roughly ten to 14 days. 1153 00:47:01.802 --> 00:47:05.122 And then as we stabilize it, we'll start taking images 1154 00:47:05.372 --> 00:47:06.840 and make sure everything is working right. 1155 00:47:06.840 --> 00:47:08.058 There's a few different transitions 1156 00:47:08.058 --> 00:47:10.577 that it goes under as it cools down. So. 1157 00:47:10.627 --> 00:47:12.746 So it's a couple of process. 1158 00:47:12.746 --> 00:47:15.065 The detail that the 1159 00:47:15.065 --> 00:47:19.203 the cooler has its own complicated calibration process. 1160 00:47:19.203 --> 00:47:21.205 Usually the telescope has a multistep process. 1161 00:47:21.205 --> 00:47:23.457 This is not just a refrigerator 1162 00:47:23.457 --> 00:47:24.658 that you turn on, but has its own. 1163 00:47:24.658 --> 00:47:27.261 I think it's a six step process and be there right now on the 1164 00:47:27.361 --> 00:47:29.363 the third stage of that cool down process. 1165 00:47:29.363 --> 00:47:31.281 The fourth stage will begin about a week from now. 1166 00:47:31.281 --> 00:47:33.517 And that's really going to accelerate the cooling of memory 1167 00:47:36.503 --> 00:47:36.870 And then 1168 00:47:36.870 --> 00:47:37.638 we really address 1169 00:47:37.638 --> 00:47:39.506 the what's happening, the science commissioning next 1170 00:47:39.506 --> 00:47:40.340 with the commissioning instruments. 1171 00:47:40.340 --> 00:47:42.392 You want to mention just what our next steps are. 1172 00:47:42.809 --> 00:47:44.027 Yeah, it was just what's happening 1173 00:47:44.027 --> 00:47:46.263 next for commissioning of the science instruments. 1174 00:47:47.848 --> 00:47:49.533 We have covered some of that. 1175 00:47:49.533 --> 00:47:50.000 Let's see. 1176 00:47:50.000 --> 00:47:51.718 So science instruments 1177 00:47:51.718 --> 00:47:54.137 mirror has to get cold that is the really big one. 1178 00:47:55.022 --> 00:47:57.958 We're walking through the for each instrument. 1179 00:47:57.958 --> 00:48:00.227 There's a set of 1180 00:48:01.762 --> 00:48:03.146 of activities 1181 00:48:03.146 --> 00:48:05.549 that each one has to show that it is working. 1182 00:48:05.883 --> 00:48:08.569 And it's things like stepping through the filter wheel 1183 00:48:08.569 --> 00:48:10.320 and making sure that you get every position, 1184 00:48:10.320 --> 00:48:13.140 the filter wheel that you want, getting the darks because 1185 00:48:13.140 --> 00:48:16.443 when you're when to understand the properties of the detector 1186 00:48:16.443 --> 00:48:19.346 so that we can take that out so that we're seeing the sky 1187 00:48:19.346 --> 00:48:22.232 and not what the not what the detectors are doing. 1188 00:48:22.916 --> 00:48:26.186 So there's doing so we're doing every step 1189 00:48:26.186 --> 00:48:28.972 in that to get those instruments ready for science. 1190 00:48:30.691 --> 00:48:31.191 Thank you. 1191 00:48:31.191 --> 00:48:33.060 We are taking two more media questions. 1192 00:48:33.060 --> 00:48:35.512 We'll take the next one, please. 1193 00:48:35.696 --> 00:48:38.815 Our next question comes from Irene Klotz from Aviation Week. 1194 00:48:38.849 --> 00:48:40.817 Your line is now open. 1195 00:48:41.184 --> 00:48:42.352 Thanks very much. 1196 00:48:42.352 --> 00:48:43.503 I have two questions. 1197 00:48:43.503 --> 00:48:46.790 Well, one question for Jane and then for Thomas. 1198 00:48:47.691 --> 00:48:50.177 Are you seeing any impacts in the GWC 1199 00:48:50.277 --> 00:48:52.796 science community? 1200 00:48:52.946 --> 00:48:55.365 Over the situation in Ukraine? 1201 00:48:55.382 --> 00:48:59.152 Are there any Russian astronomers, astrophysicists 1202 00:48:59.152 --> 00:49:01.672 involved in any of that first year science 1203 00:49:02.039 --> 00:49:04.458 and for Thomas, can you address that same question 1204 00:49:04.458 --> 00:49:06.743 more generally to the NASA science program? 1205 00:49:06.977 --> 00:49:09.429 Thanks. So thank you, Irene. 1206 00:49:09.446 --> 00:49:09.980 Unfortunately, 1207 00:49:09.980 --> 00:49:11.782 I'm going to have to circle up with you afterwards 1208 00:49:11.782 --> 00:49:12.716 we're going to try and stick 1209 00:49:12.716 --> 00:49:14.718 to some of the science and the alignment right now. 1210 00:49:14.901 --> 00:49:15.602 But I will get you 1211 00:49:15.602 --> 00:49:17.521 any information, an update on statements we have. 1212 00:49:17.521 --> 00:49:19.189 So I'll circle up with you as soon as we're done here. 1213 00:49:20.390 --> 00:49:20.691 If you 1214 00:49:20.691 --> 00:49:23.327 have another question, I would take it, 1215 00:49:23.327 --> 00:49:26.096 otherwise we can go to the next one. 1216 00:49:26.530 --> 00:49:27.948 Oh, couldn't Thomas not address 1217 00:49:27.948 --> 00:49:29.883 that question either? 1218 00:49:30.834 --> 00:49:31.952 Yeah, well, we'll stick to 1219 00:49:31.952 --> 00:49:34.471 to responding offline 1220 00:49:35.989 --> 00:49:36.840 Thank you. 1221 00:49:36.840 --> 00:49:39.559 And our next question comes from Daniel 1222 00:49:40.127 --> 00:49:43.380 Lara from our drone UI. 1223 00:49:43.430 --> 00:49:46.083 Your line is now open Hi. 1224 00:49:46.083 --> 00:49:46.850 How are you doing? 1225 00:49:46.850 --> 00:49:49.703 And thank you for this excellent relations. 1226 00:49:49.803 --> 00:49:52.622 Well, I think this question would be for Thomas 1227 00:49:53.040 --> 00:49:55.125 and even the little time would with 1228 00:49:55.125 --> 00:49:57.144 this beautiful telescope. 1229 00:49:57.594 --> 00:50:01.198 And it would be doing some plans 1230 00:50:01.198 --> 00:50:04.167 to review the telescope to get more 1231 00:50:05.719 --> 00:50:08.071 lifetime on this 1232 00:50:10.607 --> 00:50:13.460 So you're you're right that we're every time 1233 00:50:13.460 --> 00:50:16.046 we build a telescope, we think about how long we can 1234 00:50:16.380 --> 00:50:17.064 operate it. 1235 00:50:17.064 --> 00:50:19.466 I want to tell you that that delivery 1236 00:50:19.966 --> 00:50:23.754 by Arianespace and the European Space Agency was just fabulous. 1237 00:50:23.754 --> 00:50:26.873 Frankly, the lifetime of the telescope 1238 00:50:26.873 --> 00:50:31.311 that we initially said you know, about a decade or so 1239 00:50:31.311 --> 00:50:32.913 is, we believe, exceed 1240 00:50:32.913 --> 00:50:36.383 it based on what we see there as we're kind of learning 1241 00:50:36.383 --> 00:50:39.619 how to operate and point in sky, 1242 00:50:40.187 --> 00:50:42.239 the estimates of the lifetime 1243 00:50:42.239 --> 00:50:44.057 will really become more accurate. 1244 00:50:44.057 --> 00:50:46.193 So as we come to the end of commissioning, 1245 00:50:46.193 --> 00:50:48.979 I'm sure we'll get far much more accurate update. 1246 00:50:48.979 --> 00:50:51.898 I don't know whether there's anything you can say already 1247 00:50:51.898 --> 00:50:54.201 now that you haven't already said you were the person 1248 00:50:54.501 --> 00:50:54.985 who talked 1249 00:50:54.985 --> 00:50:57.587 about Lifetime before, but that's what's on our mind. 1250 00:50:57.687 --> 00:50:59.790 I think that I think Mike mentioned 1251 00:50:59.790 --> 00:51:00.807 during one of the meeting, 1252 00:51:00.807 --> 00:51:04.644 one of the press events that he thought it would be 20 years. 1253 00:51:04.644 --> 00:51:07.714 And the one thing I can add is that on the actuation 1254 00:51:07.864 --> 00:51:10.550 you know, we they have a, they will last 1255 00:51:10.550 --> 00:51:13.136 as long as the rest of the observatory. 1256 00:51:13.370 --> 00:51:15.722 They're working exactly the way we expected. 1257 00:51:15.989 --> 00:51:17.374 They have a very long lifetime. 1258 00:51:17.374 --> 00:51:19.376 So there's, there's no changes to anything 1259 00:51:19.426 --> 00:51:21.895 in the sense of the lifetime of the system. 1260 00:51:22.813 --> 00:51:23.063 Yeah. 1261 00:51:23.063 --> 00:51:24.648 And I don't think there's any new updates. 1262 00:51:24.648 --> 00:51:27.150 But as Thomas mentioned, as we go through commissioning 1263 00:51:27.150 --> 00:51:28.819 there might be some other additional updates 1264 00:51:28.819 --> 00:51:29.786 from the systems team 1265 00:51:31.855 --> 00:51:32.189 Okay. 1266 00:51:32.189 --> 00:51:34.341 Is this opportunity to make a new question? 1267 00:51:35.759 --> 00:51:37.561 I think we do have time. Yes. 1268 00:51:37.561 --> 00:51:38.762 Go right ahead. 1269 00:51:39.830 --> 00:51:40.614 Okay. 1270 00:51:40.764 --> 00:51:44.868 What will be the next target of the when science 1271 00:51:45.168 --> 00:51:48.321 starts on inside the solar system? 1272 00:51:50.390 --> 00:51:53.009 Inside the solar system. 1273 00:51:53.009 --> 00:51:54.628 There is an early release 1274 00:51:54.628 --> 00:51:57.197 science program to study 1275 00:51:57.931 --> 00:52:00.317 either Jupiter, Saturn to study them, 1276 00:52:00.951 --> 00:52:02.969 to study the gas giants 1277 00:52:02.969 --> 00:52:05.489 in our own solar system and in particular, their moons. 1278 00:52:05.839 --> 00:52:09.092 So there is a program to do that that has been competitively 1279 00:52:09.092 --> 00:52:10.944 selected and is in the queue. 1280 00:52:10.944 --> 00:52:13.113 We are doing some commissioning activities 1281 00:52:13.313 --> 00:52:17.267 to go double check that we can look at a target 1282 00:52:17.267 --> 00:52:21.087 as bright as a planet in our own solar system and still be able 1283 00:52:21.087 --> 00:52:25.142 to point at and get data on the nearby orbiting moons. 1284 00:52:26.910 --> 00:52:26.993 Well, 1285 00:52:26.993 --> 00:52:31.281 there are also some approved programs to do Trojan asteroids, 1286 00:52:31.731 --> 00:52:34.501 and there's an approved program to study 1287 00:52:34.668 --> 00:52:36.653 those asteroids that are interstellar visitors 1288 00:52:36.653 --> 00:52:37.621 from our solar system, 1289 00:52:37.621 --> 00:52:40.190 from other asteroids that have come in from outside 1290 00:52:40.190 --> 00:52:41.308 our solar system. 1291 00:52:41.308 --> 00:52:42.092 Right, Jane. 1292 00:52:42.092 --> 00:52:44.995 And of course, the reason these are such a high priority 1293 00:52:44.995 --> 00:52:47.597 and they did so well in the reviews is, of course, 1294 00:52:48.114 --> 00:52:50.333 as we have other missions actually 1295 00:52:50.333 --> 00:52:52.102 exploring the solar system, 1296 00:52:52.102 --> 00:52:53.486 the information that we can get 1297 00:52:53.486 --> 00:52:56.156 from this amazing telescope, but really help us run 1298 00:52:56.156 --> 00:52:57.390 these missions better. 1299 00:52:57.390 --> 00:53:00.093 Lucy is on its way to the very, 1300 00:53:00.093 --> 00:53:02.279 very bodies that you just talked about. 1301 00:53:02.279 --> 00:53:05.282 And yesterday, I met with the Clipper team 1302 00:53:05.282 --> 00:53:07.851 that of course, is going to launch in 24, 1303 00:53:07.851 --> 00:53:09.920 that amazing mission to go to Europe, 1304 00:53:09.920 --> 00:53:12.422 which is one of those moments that you just talked about. 1305 00:53:14.541 --> 00:53:14.808 Thank 1306 00:53:14.808 --> 00:53:17.427 you so much to everybody who has watched today 1307 00:53:17.427 --> 00:53:18.078 who was on the line 1308 00:53:18.078 --> 00:53:20.730 asking questions and who has talked to us today. 1309 00:53:21.081 --> 00:53:22.949 We are going to finish up now. 1310 00:53:22.949 --> 00:53:26.486 You can follow along and learn more about this 1311 00:53:26.486 --> 00:53:27.320 amazing telescope 1312 00:53:27.320 --> 00:53:28.488 and what's coming up this summer 1313 00:53:28.488 --> 00:53:29.873 and all of the incredible science 1314 00:53:29.873 --> 00:53:33.360 that we have talked about here today on nasa.gov slash web. 1315 00:53:33.360 --> 00:53:35.328 That's Web. 1316 00:53:35.328 --> 00:53:37.847 You can also follow along on the social media conversation 1317 00:53:37.847 --> 00:53:40.367 using hashtag unfold the universe. 1318 00:53:40.650 --> 00:53:44.371 And of course, nasa.gov is going to tell you all about the way 1319 00:53:44.371 --> 00:53:46.289 that Web interacts with all these other 1320 00:53:46.289 --> 00:53:47.757 incredible science missions and all that 1321 00:53:47.757 --> 00:53:50.994 we're doing in the solar system and beyond. 1322 00:53:51.228 --> 00:53:54.080 Thank you so much for being here today. 1323 00:53:54.080 --> 00:53:54.497 Goodbye.