1 00:00:00,020 --> 00:00:04,030 2 00:00:04,050 --> 00:00:08,090 We've produced a 30-meter global product of forest loss and 3 00:00:08,110 --> 00:00:12,130 gain on a backdrop of tree cover density. 4 00:00:12,150 --> 00:00:16,170 5 00:00:16,190 --> 00:00:20,210 The basic product looks like this 6 00:00:20,230 --> 00:00:24,240 and it is a percent tree cover layer from 2000, 7 00:00:24,260 --> 00:00:28,060 and then on top of that, forest cover loss and gain. 8 00:00:28,080 --> 00:00:32,290 We have trees as green scale color, so density 9 00:00:32,310 --> 00:00:36,330 is saturated. That's 100% tree cover, you go down to Chaco 10 00:00:36,350 --> 00:00:43,000 and you see darker shades of green, that's 505 tree cover. So this is a percent tree cover layer for 2000. 11 00:00:43,020 --> 00:00:44,470 12 00:00:44,490 --> 00:00:48,520 Probably the most intensively used forest landscape is found in the southeast United States. 13 00:00:48,540 --> 00:00:52,570 And in this product you can see all of the 14 00:00:52,590 --> 00:00:56,610 reds, blues, and magentas that are indicative of forest disturbance 15 00:00:56,630 --> 00:01:00,650 and recovery. And you see some really intense 16 00:01:00,670 --> 00:01:04,680 intense land uses. 17 00:01:04,700 --> 00:01:08,710 Out of this ecozone, 18 00:01:08,730 --> 00:01:12,730 in the southeast US, 30% of forest land 19 00:01:12,750 --> 00:01:16,780 either was regrown or lost during this period, which is 12 years, it's incredible. 20 00:01:16,800 --> 00:01:20,840 Really, trees are as crops here, you might want to re-think a definition of forest 21 00:01:20,860 --> 00:01:24,900 it's a different thing, it's not really natural. 22 00:01:24,920 --> 00:01:28,950 In the picture here we have greens, meaning the forest didn't change in the last 12 years 23 00:01:28,970 --> 00:01:32,990 you can see there's something to do with the watershed protection around a reservoir here. 24 00:01:33,010 --> 00:01:37,050 Everywhere else, the greens are stable, and the 25 00:01:37,070 --> 00:01:41,090 blacks are non-forest and then the dynamic is 26 00:01:41,110 --> 00:01:45,120 red being loss, blue being gain, and these magentas being both, during the 12 year period. 27 00:01:45,140 --> 00:01:49,150 Brazil, in the last decade, has cut their deforestation rate 28 00:01:49,170 --> 00:01:53,160 in half. Despite that decrease in Brazil's deforestation rate 29 00:01:53,180 --> 00:01:57,240 the tropics has a whole have a statistically significant increase 30 00:01:57,260 --> 00:02:02,990 and that is due to increasing rates of loss in Malaysia, Indonesia, Angola, Peru, Paraguay, 31 00:02:03,010 --> 00:02:07,990 all the other countries in our study are making up for the loss in Brazil. 32 00:02:08,010 --> 00:02:13,400 There's three things that changed in the recent past that allowed us to do a global scale Landsat, 33 00:02:13,420 --> 00:02:17,430 which is 30-meter, characterization of the land surface. 34 00:02:17,450 --> 00:02:21,460 First is, the last Landsat sensor, ETM+ on the Landsat 7 satellite, 35 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:25,490 had a global acquisition strategy. 36 00:02:25,510 --> 00:02:29,510 So we had observations everywhere. But it had a cost model associated with it, 37 00:02:29,530 --> 00:02:33,570 so you had to buy data. We always said that we would use the data we could afford, 38 00:02:33,590 --> 00:02:37,630 not what we really needed. And you were stuck, 39 00:02:37,650 --> 00:02:41,680 you couldn't do large area, large depth time series with Landsat. 40 00:02:41,700 --> 00:02:45,720 So what happened in 2008, they opened up the archive for free access. 41 00:02:45,740 --> 00:02:49,760 So we didn't even have to ask what we needed, we could use it all. 42 00:02:49,780 --> 00:02:53,790 We started thinking, let's try and mine the archive systematically. 43 00:02:53,810 --> 00:02:57,830 If we did this project on one CPU, it would have taken 15 years. 44 00:02:57,850 --> 00:03:01,850 but if we do it in the cloud, it's a matter of days. 45 00:03:01,870 --> 00:03:05,870 That's the three things: the global acquisition strategy, free data, and cloud computing 46 00:03:05,890 --> 00:03:09,940 equals the ability to do this. 47 00:03:09,960 --> 00:03:14,000 And what we like about it is if we're working at 30-meters globally, our history has been to work at global scale, 48 00:03:14,020 --> 00:03:18,060 and you get a globally consistent product and you can say what's happened 49 00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:23,860 to the earth in its entirety. But with 30-meter data we can cut out any particular place, and it should be locally relevant. 50 00:03:23,880 --> 00:03:31,210 So we have a globally consistent and locally relevant product. 51 00:03:31,230 --> 00:03:34,240 [music] 52 00:03:34,260 --> 00:03:38,270 [music] 53 00:03:38,290 --> 00:03:44,004 [beep]